Category: Civil Rights

Every Saturday at 10:30 am. San Diego Climate Mobilization Coalition Meetings January 3rd, 10th, 17th, 24th and 31st.

Every Saturday 10 am – 12 pm Peace Vigil for Palestine:

The San Diego River Park Foundation has volunteer opportunities in Ocean Beach

Every Sunday 1:30  pm – 4 pm Otay Mesa Vigil Otay Mesa Detention Center

January 1st Thursday – January 4th Sunday 10 am – 6 pm San Diego Auto Show

January 3rd Saturday 5 pm doors open “From Ground Zero” film screening fundraiser for a family in Gaza.

January 5th Monday  12 pm – 1 pm Interfaith Vigil For Earth Justice Event by Interfaith Coalition for Earth Justice

By Erwin Chemerinsky / San Diego U-T / January 2, 2025

In one of its most consequential rulings of the year, just before breaking for the holidays last week, the Supreme Court held that President Donald Trump acted improperly in federalizing the National Guard in Illinois and in activating troops across the state.

Although the case centered on the administration’s deployments in Chicago, the court’s ruling suggests that Trump’s actions in Los Angeles and Portland were likewise illegal.

Trump has said that his deployments of troops to these metro areas were just the beginning and that his administration planned to use military force in more cities across the country. The specter of U.S. troops being deployed against its citizens is inconsistent with a long history of not mobilizing the military for purposes of domestic law enforcement. Images of troops patrolling city streets are more often seen under authoritarian regimes, not in the United States. The Supreme Court’s ruling will immediately put a stop to this.

By Michael Smolens / San Diego Union-Tribune / January 2, 2026 

Maybe this time will be different.

For several years, the California Legislature and some cities like San Diego have approved numerous measures aimed at increasing home construction in the hopes that will ease the state’s chronic shortage of affordable housing.

Yet progress hasn’t met the promise as large segments of the population remain priced out of the housing market or struggle to keep up with rent.

A new year has dawned on the heels of more pro-housing regulations at the local and state level, and a vague pledge from President Donald Trump for aggressive policies to make housing more affordable nationwide.

[Please go to original for all links.]

Big real estate brokerage firms are anticipating good things this year.

Redfin has dubbed 2026 “The Great Housing Reset,” while Compass has described it as the start of a “new era,” according to CNN.

That could be. There are a lot of things to further encourage development, potentially boosting the housing stock, and some indicators that suggest the housing market, now in a lull, will pick up.

Note: Author’s views do not necessarily reflect the views of the OB Rag.

By Lisa Mortensen

Our city and county governments are looking for any avenue available to obtain revenue to feed their over-sized staffing.  Rather than pop the staffing balloon, our elected officials would like to tap into our property taxes by placing initiatives on the ballot that would require only a 51% threshold to approve these measures into law that would threaten to uncontrollably increase our property taxes and jeopardize our Prop 13 protections.

Currently the county of San Diego wants to place a measure on the ballot that would increase the real estate sales transfer tax from 55 cents for every $500 in assessed property value to $30.55 for every $500.  This would basically burden both buyers and sellers to have to come up with this excessive additional transfer tax during a for-purchase transaction.

Let’s not forget the trash tax assessment that was placed on our property tax bill ($539 and rising in 2026-2027 tax bill) by just a 51% threshold.

By Geoff Page

2025

The Rag’s editor-in-chief challenged Rag writers to provide “thoughts on the passing of 2025 and what the future portends.” That’s a big Magilla because it was a year like none other in my three-quarters of a century.

I’m not a pessimist or an optimist, some of both. But, this year, it was nearly impossible to have any sense of optimism. However, two important, positive things happened this year in my personal world. My little girl got married and a dog bit me.

By “little girl,” I mean my 32-year-old child who is beginning her seventh year in the legal profession. I did the big walk down the aisle and it was more emotional than I had imagined. It was a great experience, seeing her so happy. I’m not a fan of the institution of marriage, as a rule, but that day was an exception.

After a long professional career as a construction claims expert, I had managed to avoid ever owning – or wearing – a suit. I wore one that day and it felt right. I have a new son-in-law now that we all like and is a perfect fit for my girl.

Much as I love my girl, I will say I don’t envy parents who have to go through weddings for multiple daughters. There is this level of stress…

The dog bite was not pleasant when it occurred.

Here’s a bunch of seemingly unrelated articles that have been sitting in my “in-basket” for a while — some for months. Yet, they deserve attention –so here they are:

It was supposed to be a California utopia. It turned into a ghost town.

By Tessa McLean, California Editor – SFGate / June 17, 2024

Just off the Pearblossom Highway, 75 miles northeast of Los Angeles, six crumbling stone columns rise from patches of dusty brown weeds. Two of the wider set pillars contain capacious brick fireplaces, the blocks deteriorating inside. The foundation of a once-grand building stretches out into the flat plain, carpeted with shards of glass and rusty beer cans. At its northern end, a short staircase leads to nowhere.

From 1914 to 1918, an actual building stood here — a bustling gathering place for California’s most important utopian commune-turned-doomed desert experiment. When wandering the site today, close your eyes and you might be able to imagine happy residents dancing or talking politics on a cool California desert evening, the snow-capped San Gabriel Mountains in the distance.

The remains of a grand hotel and social hall are the only recognizable infrastructure left of the failed town, which is visible even from the highway — if you don’t blink. The foundations of other nearby buildings sink into the ground, faded blue and purple graffiti covering the splintering stone, the lettering disappearing into low concrete walls. From the middle of the ruins, trailers and warehouse structures under the power lines jolt you back to the modern day from any dreams of early 1900s life.

Here is a screen recording of a 60 Minutes segment about the Centro de Confinamiento del Terrorismo (CECOT) prison in El Salvador, which was intended to be aired December 22, 2025 but was pulled last minute for unclear reasons. Despite being pulled, it aired on Global-TV in Canada anyway.

It was pulled due to corporate censorship.

Here is an analysis by Salon – Reader Supported News

CBS News segment yanked off the air at the last minute by editor-in-chief Bari Weiss was apparently showcased in Canada, with its content quickly spreading online.

The “60 Minutes” story, “Inside CECOT,” featured testimonies from Venezuelan men deported by the Trump administration from the U.S. to CECOT, a notoriously brutal prison in El Salvador. Weiss canned the segment on Sunday, just three hours before it was set to air, saying it “wasn’t ready” to be presented.

Friday’s injunction requires city officials to stop processing permits for the controversial Chalcifica project until after they determine how to analyze its impacts.

By David Garrick / San Diego Union-Tribune / Dec. 23, 2025

A new court injunction could jeopardize a controversial 136-unit ADU development proposed for eastern Pacific Beach by requiring the city to thoroughly analyze its potential impacts, including on Native American artifacts there.

The ruling by Superior Court Judge Katherine Bacal could also lead to more rigorous approvals for other projects with large numbers of accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, that were proposed before the city rolled back a generous incentive in late August.

The injunction, issued Friday, requires city officials to stop processing permits or other approvals for the Pacific Beach project, called Chalcifica, until the city determines how to analyze its impacts.

By Michael Smolens  / San Diego Union-Tribune / December 19, 2025

[Go to original here for links]

It seems there’s hardly anything good to say about reducing homelessness in San Diego these days.

Keep that word “hardly” in mind for a minute.

San Diego’s perpetually stressed rental voucher program faces rent increases for recipients, some of whom are at risk of becoming homeless. Some cities may no longer add people to their years-long voucher waiting lists.

Greater state and local cooperation to clear out encampments on freeway-adjacent property was cheered by some officials. But the subsequent surge in shelter requests was mostly met with a no-room-at-the-inn response at the packed facilities, as reported by Blake Nelson of The San Diego Union-Tribune.

The safe parking program in Encinitas that gives homeless people a place to sleep in their cars may shut down at the end of this month amid a funding dispute.

The prospective rent increases planned by the San Diego Housing Commission are moving forward in anticipation of sweeping Trump administration cuts in homeless and housing programs that have yet to take effect. The other problems are largely independent of those coming reductions.

by Lawrence A. Herzog / Beach & Bay Press / Dec. 21, 2025

San Diego (and southern California) face a watershed moment in our quest to build more affordable housing near the sea. We are in, let us call it, a “zeitgeist design moment,” when intersecting concerns — environmental protection of our precious coastal zone, community character in low- to medium-density beach towns, social justice, and the right of all citizens to housing — collide.

This has created a maelstrom of decision choices that challenge elected officials, planners and designers. A buzzword that continues to pop up in these debates is “density.” How much is acceptable and where?

But, glaringly absent in these conversations about affordable housing, density and land use, is the question of “place.” We cannot look at a new building proposed for a given location merely in terms of its height, floor-area ratio, or the number of affordable units, or even what it looks like from the outside.

We must also consider the larger context, the types of nearby commercial establishments, the scale of existing buildings and homes, and their relation to the street, how people move around, and the mix of land uses, neighborhood institutions, cultural landmarks, and local ecological features — in short, the overall quality of the “place” where a building sits.

by Dave Schwab / Times of San Diego / Dec. 19, 2025

The battle over the controversial 23-story Vela “Turquoise tower” project in North Pacific Beach could be headed to court.

The development at 970 Turquoise St., which includes both hotel rooms and residential units, with some reserved for low-income residents, has become a poster child for growing opposition to city policies meant to spur dense homebuilding.

But even city officials who have long been advocates for the city’s housing push have sided with local opponents who say the project is out of scale with the neighborhood.

Los Angeles-based developer Kalonymus and its attorneys are now arguing the project should be considered “automatically approved” because the city missed a state deadline meant to expedite housing approvals. Their argument would require the city to issue building permits immediately.

City planners acknowledge that the project has not been approved yet— but they say Kalonymus itself has played a big role in the project’s delay.

By Donna Frye

On December 17th, a city council majority voted to adopt their Legislative Priorities for 2026. Included in those priorities was language specific to Mission Bay Park that supports amending the State Surplus Land Act to exclude Mission Bay Park so it could not be used for housing development.

Their priorities also included supporting “ legislation that would amend the State Surplus Land Act to clarify that not all public land is suitable for housing, particularly where development would conflict with the City Charter or voter-approved measures, including, but not limited to, dedicated public parkland such as Mission Bay Park, Balboa Park, Mission Trails Regional Park, other regional parks, open space, or canyons.”

This is the outcome we all have worked so hard for since July, when we first learned about the issue of surplus land.  At that time, it looked like it might be a done deal since the Land Use and Housing Committee had voted to support it. But we got the matter continued when it went to the city council and here we are- not out of the woods but headed in the right direction.