The Absurdity of ‘Exclusionary Zoning’ in Emerald Hills
By Robert Campbell
On Tuesday, July 7th, we saw something spectacular. Councilmember Henry Foster III and County Supervisor Monica Montgomery Steppe’s defense of the Emerald Hills “Radio Towers” development which relied heavily on a well-substantiated historical truth: that large lot zoning was historically used as an exclusionary tool to keep minorities out of wealthy, white neighborhoods. But applying that historical framework to the Radio Towers project is a profound misdirection.
Their impassioned argument has left the community deeply puzzled, not because the history is wrong, but because the application of it in this instance is completely inverted.
Selective Application of Housing Density
The claim that dismantling large-lot restrictions is an act of racial and economic equity will leave you scratching your head when looking at a map of San Diego. The policy enacted here, Footnote 7, was a direct shot at Emerald Hills and Encanto, historically minority-majority neighborhoods. If the goal truly were to use smaller lot sizes to desegregate and dismantle historical exclusion, that policy would be aggressively targeted at the predominantly white, high-resource neighborhoods that actually practiced that exclusion. Instead, those wealthy neighborhoods in San Diego remain entirely intact and protected with their large lots, while two minority-majority neighborhoods are now forced to absorb density and lose their remaining open space to this density that white neighborhoods are not required to do.


By Shireen Akram-Boshar /
Lorenzo Salgado Araujo lived in Houston for 35 Years, Built Homes for Others; Videos and Witnesses Contradict ICE Narrative of Murder
The Ocean Beach Historical Society “Ye Old Tale of King Snedley’s Beer and Holland Embassy on Sunset Cliffs Boulevard”
By Quinta Jurecic /
By Kate Callen
By Patty Ducey-Brooks / 
A View From the United Kingdom
El Pueblo Viejo de San Diego: Hiding in Plain Sight, Part 5
Hailed by legendary film critic Roger Ebert as best film of the year and the ninth-best overall film of the 2000s.
By Shannon Handy / 




Recent Comments