OB Rag

By Geoff Page

What follows is a more detailed accounting of the Mission Bay Park Committee meeting on August 5. As recounted here in The Rag on August 6, the committee sent the city a clear message by voting 7-2-1 against the city’s proposal to declare Mission Bay park land surplus land.

The city’s position and the opposition’s position at the meeting are detailed in the following paragraphs.

City’s Position

Andy Field, Director of the Parks and Recreation Department, presented the city’s surplus land proposal. His first references were to the City Charter to explain how Mission Bay lease revenues are shared.  Field referenced Article V, Executive and Administrative Service, Section 55: Parks and Recreation, SubSection 55.2: Mission Bay Park and Regional Parks Improvement Funds.

By JW August

President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice, as reported by the Associated Press, is asking 15 states, including California, for copies of voter registration lists from election administrators for 2020 and 2024.  The Department of Justice is leading the effort to pursue what it’s calling “widespread” voter fraud. It’s a reversal of the department’s longtime policy of protecting access to the ballot box.

These debunked claims of fraud have long been perpetuated by Trump and his allies.

My Feb. 1 story published by the OB Rag now appears to have been just the beginning — a small reveal inside the Pandora’s box of this president’s politics. 

by Ernie McCray

That shit ICE pulled in my old neighborhood
still sits with me,
all that rushing into town,
spraying gasses
and snatching people around,
ridiculously and literally laying siege on
a community,
fueled by a sick man’s
hatefulness and insanity.

And I can’t help but take it personally
because I spent 30 of the most wonderful years of my life
on the very block
this incredibly wicked abuse
took place –
a neighborhood as good as any to be found
any place.

By Geoff  Page

After listening to the city’s presentation and unanimous, one-sided public comment, the Mission Bay Park Committee voted a resounding no on the city’s surplus lands proposal. The city’s plan, as detailed here in The Rag, involves declaring three land parcels in Mission Bay as surplus lands. Like the city did with 46 acres in the Midway area.

From the city’s website:

The Mission Bay Park Committee advises the Park and Recreation Board on the development, utilization, and policies regarding Mission Bay Park.

The committee meeting was held at the Paradise Point Resort on Ingraham Street in Mission Bay, August 5, starting at 6:00 p.m.

The Surplus Lands agenda item:

202. Recommendation to City Council to Declare City-Owned Real Property within Mission Bay Park as Surplus Land

The objective of the city’s presentation was to obtain the parks committee support for two things. The city first wanted the committee’s support for the surplus lands proposal.

It’s that time of year again — the OB Rag’s annual summer fundraising campaign during the first weeks of August.

We only do this once a year, so help us reach our goal of $3,000 over the next two weeks. We do have bills — just our annual server bill is $900. We do pay some of our reporters and writers a small amount, usually $35 to $50 an article, plus we have subscription bills and utilities to pay.

Over this last 2 years, the Rag has become the online platform for dissatisfied residents of many neighborhoods besides Ocean Beach and Point Loma – disgruntled and frustrated fellow citizens upset with the leadership of the city, the mayor’s Bonus ADU program, the so-called Complete Communities plan  – that people from University City, Encanto, Middletown, Hillcrest, Talmadge, Pacific Beach, Linda Vista, Clairemont — the list keeps growing – are increasingly using the Rag to sound off.

For some reason, locals are having trouble gaining traction about their travails from the mainstream or other online media and press. So, increasingly, they look to the Rag for support.

As the Rag is a platform of and for citizen journalists, we are often there for them.

So, help us keep it going.

How to Support Us

Send us a one-time donation via our PayPal button on the homepage; or

Become a regular monthly contributor; via PayPal on the homepage; or

Send us a check made out to “OB Rag” to:

OB Rag
PO Box 7012
Ocean Beach, CA 92167

Here are more reasons to contribute to the OB Rag:

By Allison Depner

You’ve probably seen me traipsing around O.B. wearing a tie-dyed T-shirt or dress along with dangly earrings while using my white cane.  Lately, I’ve added sunglasses and a hat to my ensemble. As a blind person, I’ve encountered all sorts of behaviors from sighted people. The most common reaction I encounter is unsolicited help in the form of taking hold of my arm. Other reactions include telling me that a curb is coming up and silencing a conversation until I pass. I’ve also been accused of pretending to be blind or being able to see more than I let on.

Until yesterday, these mostly benign behaviors have been somewhat easy to ignore and could be attributed to ignorance. Sure, sometimes I feel annoyed, and respond with impatience and irritation.  I try to remind myself that the average well-meaning person on the street probably doesn’t know that telling me about the upcoming curb actually distracts me from focusing on the tactile information that I receive from my cane. I realize that most people truly want to help, and their hearts are in the right place.

So, what happened yesterday?

By Lynne Clark Miller

My granddaughter, Petra, just graduated from Point Loma High School. Watching the ceremony, I remembered my mother, who graduated from PLHS in 1936. I didn’t expect to get a lump in my throat or tears in my eyes when I heard the Point Loma School Song.  But it happened.  Memories surfaced as I watched the 2025 graduation. Four generations walked to Pomp and Circumstance across the football field. Dorothy Gage, Jon, Lynne, and June Clark, and my children, Mark and Cory Miller walked in my memories this June, 2025.

I lived in OB, spent my summers at the beach with friends, and walked home with a sandy towel, and a chocolate bar from Paras Shop. Those days of sun and salt air rest in my DNA and ignite memories of youth.  I rode my bike to OB Elementary, car-pooled and walked to Collier, and took a bus or walked to PLHS. When I went to Collier there was no Nimitz Blvd.  There was just a canyon ribboned with dirt pathways that we explored after the final bell. I remember the excitement of seeing guys who we knew cruise by in their very cool cars.  Sometimes my friends and I would get a ride home with Tim or Curt.  Getting to and from school was part of the whole adventure, wasn’t it?

When Petra Lynne reached out and got her diploma this year, all of the family hands who were PLHS grads were there, reaching across time– at least from my vantage point. Maybe that lump in my throat was encouraged by my Pointer memories!  The first day at PLHS, my way too blue contact lens looked into the mirror at my very tan face with white lipstick, sunbleached hair and an anxious smile.  Walking through the halls over the years was a hormone high.

By Donna Frye

Below are  my comments to the Mission Bay Park Committee for the August 5 Meeting.

RE:  Oppose Item 202, Recommendation to City Council to Declare City-Owned Real Property within Mission Bay Park as Surplus Land

Dear Chair Johnson and Honorable Committee Members,

I am writing to ask this committee to oppose the mayor’s recommendation to declare City-Owned Real Property within Mission Bay Park as Surplus Land.

Last month, when I first learned that the mayor was asking the city council to declare three properties in Mission Bay Park “surplus land” I could not believe what I was reading. After lots of research, it became clear that a “surplus land” declaration would allow developers to submit proposals to the city to build affordable housing in Mission Bay Park.

How could state-granted Tidelands on dedicated public parkland (that was codified by the voters as parkland in perpetuity by San Diego City Charter Section 55 ) be declared “surplus” and made available for developers to submit proposals to build affordable housing?

It made no sense to me then and it still doesn’t.

August 4, 2025

PRESS ADVISORY

City Council Attempts To Give Away Mission Bay Park Land  – Committee Meeting Tuesday, 6 pm., at Paradise Point.

The Mission Bay Park Committee (MBPC) will meet at 6:00 p.m., on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. The meeting will be at Paradise Point (Mission Bay Room)
It is reported that multiple City Councilmembers will be appearing in an effort to explain why the City is trying to sell parklands (potentially for upscale condominiums). The meeting will be held in Paradise Point’s Mission Bay Room.

Without input from the MBPC or San Diego Park Board, the Council attempted to move forward to declare three separate parcels in Mission Bay Park as “surplus land,” under State law, in order to put them out to bid. Under State law, once land becomes surplus, priority has to be given to low income housing projects. Most likely, any “low income” project would simply put expensive condominiums in Mission Bay Park, with the developer building low income housing elsewhere as a credit to get the long-
term lease.

This would be first time that the City of San Diego has sold off park land for residential development.

Dozens of Pacific Beach residents and supporters gathered Monday, August 4th, at the site of a controversial large-scale ADU development planned for the corner of Pacifica and Bluffside as an attorney announced a lawsuit against the City of San Diego.

The neighborhood group Neighbors for a Better Pacific Beach is the chief plaintiff in the suit, designed to halt the planned Chalcifica project, with more than 100 units.

The suit argues the planned project would harm the environment and public safety, and the group behind it points out it’s on the site of a well-known Kumeyaay coastal village.

In today’s San Diego Union-Tribune, writer Jemma Stephenson reports:

According to the plaintiffs, the city should have processed the project application on a discretionary basis but instead has handled them all on a ministerial basis, based on set standards rather than individual judgments. They also say the city never responded to the Kumeyaay Cultural Repatriation Committee’s request to meet about the issue.

By Donna Frye
The Mission Bay Park Committee will meet August 5 at 6 p.m. at the Paradise Point Resort to discuss Item 202 and hear public testimony on the mayor’s proposal to declare three properties in Mission Bay Park “surplus land” and make the properties available to affordable housing developers as part of the process.

This issue was heard and continued at the July 29 City Council meeting.

Below are links to view the Mission Bay Park Committee meeting agenda and also the mayor’s staff report. If you cannot attend the meeting in person, you can submit online comments using the link below.

Please let the committee know that you do NOT support declaring Mission Bay Park “surplus land” especially since no options for seeking an exemption to the Surplus Land Act have been provided to the city council, the Mission Bay Park Committee or to the public.

There is no urgency to declare the properties the mayor wants to lease as “surplus land” since they are all producing revenue for the city and the lease for the largest property, Marina Village, doesn’t expire until 2027.

On Monday, August 1, 2025 at 11:00 AM at the intersection of Pacifica Drive and Bluffside Avenue, Pacific Beach, members For a Better Pacific Beach will announce to the filing of its suit against the City to stop the processing of Christian Spicer’s 136 ADU project, “Chalcifica.”

The community group “Neighbors for a Better Pacific Beach” and dozens of supporters will announce the filing of the lawsuit to stop the proposed development on a parcel of land that sits atop the site of a significant historical Kumeyaay village in a Very High Fire Hazard Zone.

The project developer, Christian Spicer, is the subject of intense criticism by community groups. Spicer consistently ignores neighborhood concerns when he crams massive, multi-story ADUs with no parking in single-family areas.

“Christian Spicer’s proposed 136-unit ADU project is a poster child for bad planning, inadequate city review, the rejection of valid community concerns, and predatory practices,” said Merv Thompson, Chair of Neighbors for a Better Pacific Beach.