OB Rag

Earlier today, Friday, Feb. 20, the Rag re-posted an article from the Times of San Diego about Richard Bailey, the former mayor of Coronado, who has just announced he is in the running for the District 2 San Diego City Council seat.

In Times reporter Tessa Balc’s Feb. 19 article, she says this:

“As mayor of Coronado he [Bailey] was affiliated with the Republican Party. He has since re-registered as an independent.”

Now to be clear, Bailey is not quoted as saying this — Balc the reporter says it. Where did she get it, if not from Bailey? (We have a call into her at the Times.)

“We’re still “Enron-by-the-Sea”

By San Diego U-T Editorial Board / Feb 20, 2026

Most of San Diego’s elected leaders keep confirming that they can’t be trusted. There’s their hypocrisy about the “digital divide” — it’s awful when supermarkets inconvenience people who aren’t tech-savvy but not when city parking programs do far worse. There’s the two-facedness about “fairness” and affordability — Councilmember Sean Elo-Rivera nobly criticizes all the evil corporations and out-of-towners that he says are exploiting San Diegans, then embraces the city’s plans to hammer residents, especially poorer ones, by adding to existing fees or creating new ones.

[Please go to original for links]

And at the top of the ladder is Mayor Todd Gloria, who never hesitates to offer preposterous descriptions of his administration’s actions. This was on display in early January. After the disastrous rollout of paid parking at Balboa Park, the U-T reported that he argued “the new system is functioning well and being ‘actively adopted’” — even as he suspended the collection of fees.

The League of Women Voters San Diego have just announced that they have set up two candidate forums for City Council District 2 this spring.

The first is scheduled for Thursday, March 5  –    5:30-7:30 PM  at the Cathy Hopper Clairemont Friendship Center, located at  4425 Bannock Ave, San Diego 92117   This Forum is hosted by the Clairemont Town Council and the League of Women Voters, SD

By Jillian Butler

Within the Peninsula Community and San Diego as a whole, homelessness continues to be a pervasive topic brought up in social media discourse, political campaigns, and community meetings.

It is equally divisive as it is pervasive. Some argue for strict crackdowns while others worry about over-policing. Regardless of individual feelings, the homelessness crisis of San Diego is a problem that requires concrete solutions. Ocean Beach has always prided itself on compassion. But compassion alone hasn’t resolved the growing tension around homelessness in 92107.

The San Diego Regional Homeless Task Force estimated that there were no less than 9,905 homeless residing within San Diego County in 2025. At least 221 of those individuals are in the 92107 area code. The average age of those experiencing homelessness is 43 years old. The gender demographics are closely split with 51% being female and 49% being male. Racially, Black people of color make up 48% of the homeless population. Both senior (age 55+) and youth (age 12-24) homeless rates are consistently increasing.

by Tessa Balc / Times of San Diego / Feb. 19, 2026,

To little surprise, Richard Bailey has announced that he’s running for the District 2 seat on the San Diego City Council. All that’s left to do is file the forms.

After sending out campaign-style mailers, announcing a ballot measure to remove trash and parking fees — which has yet to materialize — and relocating to Point Loma, the former mayor of Coronado said on Wednesday that he’s planning to seek the council seat.

In his Instagram announcement, Bailey asked for support for what he described as a “non-partisan, policy-focused, back-to-basics” campaign. As mayor of Coronado he was affiliated with the Republican Party. He has since re-registered as an independent.

Over the last year Bailey has positioned himself to move the needle in San Diego politics through viral Instagram videos which focus on quality-of-life issues that don’t follow stringent party lines.

A Republican plan to overhaul voting is back. Here’s what’s new in the bill

By Benjamin Swasey  / NPR / Feb. 19j, 2026 

A Republican voting overhaul is back on Capitol Hill — with an added photo identification provision and an altered name — as President Trump seeks to upend elections in a midterm year. Opponents say the legislation would disenfranchise millions of voters.

The Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act — now dubbed the SAVE America Act — narrowly passed the U.S. House last week, with all Republicans and one Democrat backing the bill.

Its approval came about 10 months after House Republicans last passed the SAVE Act.

The measure, which would transform voter registration and voting across the country, faces persistent hurdles in the GOP-led Senate due to Democratic disapproval and the 60-vote threshold to clear the legislative filibuster. Some Republicans have called for maneuvering around the filibuster to pass the legislation, but GOP leadership has been cool to the idea.

The overhaul would require eligible voters to provide proof of citizenship — like a valid U.S. passport, or a birth certificate plus valid photo identification — when registering to vote. The new iteration adds a requirement that voters also provide photo ID when casting their ballot.

OB’s Historical District Needs to Be Protected

As it stands now, on Tuesday, the 24th of February in the afternoon, the San Diego City Council will get to decide on a good deal of the future of Ocean Beach.

There is an animal out there ready to devour our sedate coastal village and it’s called “Preservation and Progress Package A.” It’s a set of policy proposals affecting how the city preserves and designates historical properties — or neighborhoods. These “reforms” specifically call out the historic district that Ocean Beach enjoys, called the “Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historical District”.

Why? What’s going on?

OBceans aware of the neighborhood know there’s many small cottages scattered throughout the blocks that make up Ocean Beach, but may not be aware that these old cottages add besides the obvious an historic character to the community — plus add certain protections.

The original application for an Ocean Beach historical district designation was filed with the state Department of Parks and Recreation on June 2, 1999, by the now-late OB Planning Board member Priscilla McCoy.

The district is termed “emerging” because there never has been a complete survey of all the buildings that potentially qualify to be historic. Usually a full historic district designation protects surrounding buildings, even ones not considered historic, in order to preserve community character. And lately, the city has been arguing that OB’s historical designation applies only to the 72 cottages, built between 1887 and 1931. And nothing else. Yet, several local OB historians estimate the total number of potentially historic cottages at more than 300.

By Arturo Castañares / La Prensa / Feb. 18, 2026

Three former Republican elected city leaders now head up three of the area’s top civic groups, even as Democrats hold every elected position in the City of San Diego.

This week, former San Diego City Councilman Mark Kersey was announced as the new CEO of the San Diego County Taxpayers’ Association, while former Councilman Chris Cate leads the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce, and former San Diego City Councilman and Mayor Kevin Faulconer leads the San Diego Lincoln Club business league.

The three men served in office concurrently from 2014 to 2020.

Kersey, who served two terms on the City Council from 2012 to 2020, took over the local taxpayer advocacy group after its former leader, Haney Hong, resigned last March. The organization monitors government agencies and awards its annual Golden Fleece Award for the worst use of taxpayer dollars, as well as its Media Watchdog Award for news coverage of local agencies.

By South OB Girl

It is unfortunate for San Diegans that many wise words have fallen on deaf ears during the proceedings of the city’s “Preservation and Progress Package A,” which proposes amendments to existing policies for historic properties, historic communities, historic designation, de novo appeal, and San Diego’s historical resources.  As Save Our Heritage Organisation (SOHO) described in their January 9, 2026 OB Rag article:

This fast-tracked proposal would weaken San Diego’s historic preservation program by allowing the City Council to override expert historic designations, thereby stripping protections from historic districts… while prioritizing new construction over true preservation.

Package A specifically targets Ocean Beach for the construction of high-density Complete Communities Housing Solutions and specifies Ocean Beach for the removal of historic protections.  This would pave the way for high-density housing developments with greatly reduced setback requirements and little to no on-site parking.  Such construction is currently not allowed in OB.

Package A paves the way to annihilate the small beach town as we know it while flooding our community with big box apartment buildings that could be mixed in with single family homes and historic beach cottages. Such development would have a myriad of repercussions including oversaturation of on street parking due to limited on-site parking and a strain on public utilities such as water, sewer, and power.

By David Garrick / Union-Tribune / Feb. 19, 2026

San Diego City Council members said Wednesday, Feb. 18, they’ve found a way to comply with a new state law on public hearings that won’t require them to limit public input.

The city will create a new type of testimony called a formal group presentation to comply with the law, Senate Bill 707.

Officials are choosing that option to avoid the unpopular move of barring meeting participants from donating their allotted speaking time to another speaker.

City officials and community leaders say allowing people to donate speaking time to someone with similar views on an issue is a good thing.

They say it allows the leader of a large group to make a longer, more detailed presentation summarizing the group’s views.

“One person speaking for 15 minutes is much more efficient than 15 people speaking for one minute,” Council President Joe LaCava said. “It’s also more robust.”

By Kate Callen

In rejecting proposals for deeper fiscal analysis of city-driven fee ballot measures, three San Diego City Councilmembers decided February 18 that preserving a broken status quo is more important than restoring public faith in city governance.

Councilmember Raul Campillo’s efforts to keep voters better informed through cost-of-service studies were brusquely dismissed by his colleagues on the Rules Committee. Joe La Cava and Vivian Moreno took umbrage that Campillo would even suggest such a thing. Kent Lee worried that greater transparency about a ballot initiative would create “a multitude of hurdles” for raising existing fees or creating new ones.

A fourth committee member, Sean Elo-Rivera, participated remotely and did not speak.

Campillo’s proposals were driven by public outrage over the notorious 2022 “bait and switch” trash fee Measure B. Voters approved the initiative after the Independent Budget Analyst (IBA) estimated that monthly fees would run $23 to $29. When the measure passed, the city announced that — oops! — the actual monthly fees would approach $50.

By Nico Calavita / Op-Ed SD Union-Tribune / February 17, 2026 

When I was a professor at SDSU in the Graduate Program in City Planning, I taught my students that one of the most important goals for planners is to ensure that growth is accompanied by public facilities and infrastructure; otherwise, a city’s quality of life will suffer.

The recently approved College Area Community Plan, when measured against such a principle, fails in catastrophic ways. It significantly increases residential densities in an area with practically no public facilities and without adequate financing mechanisms for future infrastructure. The only, single-minded goal appears to be to increase residential building capacity; lack of infrastructure be damned.

This approach is a reversal of a long tradition of planning in San Diego based on accommodating growth where public facilities were available or would become available as growth occurred; with a notable, tragic omission. Let me explain.