OB Rag

by Macy Meinhardt / San Diego Voice & Viewpoint / July 16, 2025

If you’ve been following our housing coverage over the past year, you’ve likely come across several mentions of a convoluted zoning policy known as Footnote 7.

Approved in 2019 without community input, Footnote 7 changed the minimum lot size in certain Southeastern San Diego planning areas—from 20,000 square feet per lot to just 5,000. This change was made to allow for more housing developments, but community backlash led to the footnote’s removal in April.

It was considered a partial win for a community that felt the zone change was discriminatory and discreet, as it only applied to Southeastern San Diego, a region known for concentrated poverty and minority populations.

Although the footnote was removed for future projects, it still applies to developments that were already in the approval process when the rule was in place.

Which takes us to where we are today: the Klauber Development debate.

By Robert Campbell / Special to the OB Rag

In a 6-3 vote that has left all Encanto community members and advocates stunned and deeply dismayed, the San Diego City Council approved the controversial Klauber Project last night, July 15, ignoring a mountain of critical legal case law and policy violations laid out in detail by land use attorney Craig Sherman. The site is located at 1362 Klauber Avenue.

The vote bypassed not only dozens of inconsistencies with state and local law, it also faced overwhelming opposition from residents of the Chollas Valley including the Encanto and Emerald Hills neighborhoods — historically underserved, low-resource, and environmentally burdened communities.  Not a single person spoke in favor of the development, with over 60 minutes of public testimony against the project and an additional 30 written statements submitted against approval. The developer declined to make any presentation or statement.

Despite urgent pleas from all community members and advocates in attendance, including myself as the Chair of the Chollas Valley Community Planning Group, along with a comprehensive legal memo from attorney Craig Sherman exposing the project’s many legal violations, the council moved forward with a decision that reflects a troubling pattern: the prioritization of development over equity, environmental justice, and community voice.

By David Garrick / San Diego Union-Tribune / July 15, 2025

San Diego finalized a controversial plan Monday to replace hundreds of thousands of trash and recycling bins — many of them new or only a few years old — and send the $65 million bill to customers.

City officials say the move is part of upgrading service just as San Diego begins levying its first-ever trash pickup fee.

They contend the new cans will boost dependability, reliability and accountability because they are equipped with special tracking chips and will look different than the old cans so that crews can recognize them.

At last count, the newly formed San Diego Community Coalition comprised 25 San Diego communities plus multiple organizations that have united to exert concerted pressure on elected San Diego officials to address two intersecting issues: 1) Overbuilding incompatible ADU complexes and towers in residential neighborhoods; and 2) City Hall’s flagrant disrespect for constituents and communities.

The popular OB Rag serves as the platform for the San Diego Community Coalition, posting accessible news and updates. You can also follow timely news on its Facebook page HERE.

Stay tuned for news on our upcoming protests, including one planned against the 14-story high-rise in Midtown at 3677 Columbia Street. Click HERE for more information about this highly contested Complete Communities project.

Our next general and public meeting will be held on Saturday, July 26th from 10 to noon, at the Pacific Beach Library in the community room at 4275 Cass St San Diego 92109 .

First the bad news:

A divided San Diego City Council approved a controversial housing development in Encanto on Tuesday, July 15, even as they acknowledged the 23-home project was made possible by a since-repealed policy that critics call racist.

The council voted 6-3 in favor of the project after Councilmember Henry Foster, who cast one of the “no” votes, searched unsuccessfully for grounds to reject it that were legally sound enough to satisfy his colleagues.

Council members who voted to approve the project said they had no choice, because the allegedly racist policy that had paved the way for it wasn’t repealed until April — long after the project had gotten far enough into the city’s approval pipeline to be deemed a complete proposal.

People in Encanto are very upset with this vote — which the Rag plans to cover. In the meantime ….

During the hearing, Paul Krueger spoke on behalf of the newly-formed San Diego Community Coalition. Paul is a long-time San Diego journalist, member of the influential Neighbors for a Better San Diego, and occasional contributor to the Rag. Here are his remarks as transcribed by a Rag writer:

By City News Service – 10News /July 15, 2025

A public records lawsuit was filed Monday seeking documents from the city of San Diego related to the recent $250 million proposal to transform the blighted 101 Ash St. building into affordable housing units.

The city’s Land Use and Housing Committee recently voted unanimously to recommend approving a deal to enter into a 60-year lease to convert the long- vacant property into nearly 250 residential units for families earning between 30% and 80% of the area’s median income.

Copies of the ground lease and disposition and development agreement — which were not available at the time of the committee’s vote — are being sought in a new lawsuit filed on behalf of city resident John Gordon, who previously sued the city over its lease-to-own agreement for the 101 Ash St. property.

“City officials are attempting to approve the 101 Ash Street (disposition and development agreement) and ground lease and related documents while concealing their essential terms from public scrutiny,” the complaint filed in San Diego Superior Court reads.

By Donna Frye / Special to OB Rag

I have never seen the words “surplus lands” used in the same sentence as Mission Bay Park and it was shocking to say the least.

I had no idea that dedicated public parkland was subject to the Surplus Lands Act until I read Geoff Page’s July 9 article about Mission Bay Park in the OB Rag.

After doing some research, I learned that the “surplus lands” issue in Mission Bay Park was heard at a July 2, 2025 Land Use and Housing Committee meeting as Item Number 11.

Included in the documents was a Notice of Availability soliciting lease proposals for the three Mission Bay Park properties which states in part:

“If the City receives more than one letter of interest for any of the Properties during the 60-day response period, it will give first priority to entities proposing to develop housing where at least 25 percent of the units will be affordable to lower income households. If more than one such proposal is received to ground lease any of the Properties, the City will give priority to the proposal with the greatest number of lower income affordable units. If more than one proposal specifies the same number of lower income affordable units for any of the Properties, priority will be given to the proposal that has the lowest average affordability level.”

I took 10 minutes to make calls! You can do this!

Every action, every voice matters! Danna wrote an article in the OB RAG that will help your voice be heard. The article is titled:
Proposed SB 79 Makes SB 10 and Bonus ADUs Look Like ‘Gentle Density’ — Contact Our Assembly Members Today to Oppose It

Take 5 minutes to read the article in the Rag, and another 5-10 minutes to call all of the assembly people listed, and ask them to vote no on SB 79. They will ask for your full name and Zip Code.

Todd Gloria, mayor of San Diego, appears to have won the recent round on the city budget with both the City Council and the Municipal Employees Association — who represents most of the city’s workforce. Gloria refused to fire any of the hundreds of so-called “middle managers” in order to fill in the $350 million deficit — something the Council and MEA — and public — wanted.

Voice of San Diego reported:

Mayor Todd Gloria and his office are making clear none of their employees are on the chopping block.

Mayoral spokesperson Rachel Laing stated:

“As noted by the City Attorney’s Office, the Mayor alone is responsible for making decisions for his office, which includes the City’s executive team and other mayoral departments.”

Laing “added that the mayor will continue to make staffing decisions based on what the mayor thinks is needed to run a responsive and effective city government,” says the Voice.

The plight of middle managers became an issue in discussions during “controversial budget negotiations this spring” — which “pitted Mayor Todd Gloria against city labor leaders — and eventually most of the City Council,” reports David Garrick of the San Diego U-T.

And we have to add that members of the public at large — city residents — also chimed in about doing away with the many managerial positions the city has,

By Lorena Gonzalez / San Diego Union-Tribune Op-Ed / July 13, 2025

Abundance.

Of course!

But abundance for whom?

The labor movement has always been supportive of dreaming big, building large projects, increasing housing supply and completing massive infrastructure projects.

That’s what union workers do — skillfully build things, advocate within our communities for government-driven investments and large infrastructure projects, and support campaigns for those investments. And, I would argue, our unions know better than anyone what happens when government-funded infrastructure projects and jobs get held up with unnecessary delays, duplicative permitting processes and red tape.

We see it with the waning interest in California high-speed rail as the delays and permitting impediments make it a punching bag for right-wing politicians. We saw it with our own members, as massive public investments by President Biden simply took too long for the effect to trickle down and be felt in terms of the good union jobs that were guaranteed.

Our main criticism with “the Abundance agenda” isn’t about what it does — in terms of reducing regulations to speed up development to increase supply — but what it fails to do. Streamlining development must be tied to labor and environmental standards so that there is a clear public benefit and not just a giveaway to developers.

By Alexandra Mendoza and Teri Figueroa / The San Diego Union-Tribune / July 13, 2025

At a Linda Vista apartment complex, masked federal agents recently swarmed an undocumented immigrant to make an arrest as an angry crowd gathered in protest, in a scene that has played out in viral videos across social media amid the Trump administration’s immigration crackdown.

Standing in front of yellow police tape, between the agents and bystanders, stood San Diego police officers.

“All we are here for is scene security,” the officer told Arturo Gonzalez, an activist recording the operation. “We have not made any immigration arrests.”

Gonzalez wasn’t convinced: “You’re not making any arrests. You are just protecting them so they can do their duties.”

California law is clear. Local law enforcement agencies cannot assist federal agents with immigration enforcement. But local cops have been increasingly called to the scenes of such arrests in recent weeks as public immigration arrests continue to roil communities.

Police are in a thorny spot.

Thursday, July 17, 7:00 PM, the Ocean Beach Historical Society presents: From Lomaland to the Mediterranean Riviera, The Story of Sunset Cliffs and Neighboring Subdivisions, Featuring Ron May, at Waters Edge Community Center at 1984 Sunset Cliffs Blvd., O.B.

The presentation is based on the 2004, City of San Diego, Historical Nomination of the Joseph E. and Esten Shreve House, 4510 Alhambra Street in Point Loma.

We hope to see you at the program. All OBHS programs are FREE!