OB Rag

by Scott Hopkins / Times of San Diego / June 26, 2026 

The new principal of Point Loma High School, set to start this coming school year, is returning to a school where his career in education began. In 2002, veteran educator Michael Santos worked as an AVID tutor in 2002.

In the nearly 24 years since, Santos taught biology and AP biology for 10 years, followed by 13 years in administration, most recently as principal at Orange Glen High School in Escondido, where he has worked since July 2022.

He is a native San Diegan and graduated from Morse High School in 1997 before attending college at UC San Diego, San Diego State University and Cal State San Marcos.

“San Diego will start allowing lengthy group presentations by online participants at City Council meetings next Monday,” David Garrick at the UT reports. He surmises that it’s “a fundamental policy change that could make meetings significantly longer.”

But that’s not all the changes it would make. And it’s all supposed to boost “public participation.” The City Council approved it Monday, June 29.

Garrick states:

“The council was forced to change its policy for group presentations by a new state law – Senate Bill 707 – that seeks equal rights for people submitting testimony online versus in person. The goal is leveling the public participation playing field for working families, homebound residents, people traveling and others who can’t conveniently attend public meetings in person.”

By JW August / Times of San Diego / June 28, 2026

The city of San Diego has spent years trying to build a new fire station in the Mid-City area that would address a glaring weakness in the city’s emergency response system.

But environmental and community groups have opposed the specific location the city has settled on, arguing it would remove precious open space from a neighborhood that’s already starved for it.

The city selected its preferred site — on a hillside in the Webster neighborhood of City Heights, at 47th Street and Fairmount Avenue near a mobile home park catering to seniors — in 2015. That was five years after an outside report by a consultant identified the area as the most significant gap in the city’s fire response. Another report, in 2017, confirmed the need.

Project opponents — like Charles Rili, deputy director of the Sierra Club’s local chapter, and Leslie Reynolds, executive director of Groundworks San Diego-Chollas Creek — share the desire to plug that gap. But they argue the chosen location would permanently scar current open space and lead to the destruction of habitat in the Chollas Creek watershed.

Rilli said the the city is “digging its heels in” and refusing to recognize the location as one of the few open spaces for residents in the urban environment.

From Neighbors for a Better California

The latest public records released this past week confirm that Project Vela remains under active City review. No final decision has been made on the project’s requested height, scale, incentives, or waivers.

Before the City can make those determinations, the developer must still resolve key technical issues identified during the review process, including floor area calculations, fire protection, stormwater management, and the legal basis for the project’s requested waivers.

Rather than becoming clearer as the review has progressed, the records show that important questions remain unresolved across multiple technical areas.

NFABC has submitted an additional Public Records Act request for missing documents referenced in the file. Our volunteer team brings experience in law, city planning, community planning, public communications, and state housing legislation. This expertise allows us to analyze complex records, ask informed questions, and help hold the City’s review process accountable so Project Vela is not approved for more height, density, or scale than California law and the San Diego Municipal Code allow.

What the Latest Records Show

Fire Safety Review Continues

The City’s Fire Suppression reviewer stated that, after multiple rounds of review, proper and complete responses had still not been provided for the issues identified. The reviewer noted that little progress had been made and advised the design team to resolve the outstanding issues before additional reviews continued.

Ocean Beach’s Earliest Shoreline Resident

By Debbie L. Sklar

Just south of today’s permanently closed Ocean Beach Pier, where the cliffs drop sharply into sand and surf, a small shack once clung to the edge of the coastline. In the late 1800s, this stretch of San Diego shoreline looked nothing like the developed beach community it would later become. It was open coast— windswept, loosely governed, and still taking shape.

Ocean Beach history is full of figures who appear in fragments rather than full biographies: a photograph, a passing reference in an archive, or a story repeated just often enough to survive. One of the earliest documented residents tied to this shoreline was Captain Abraham Thomas.

Thomas is associated with a small shack near what is now the Ocean Beach Pier during the late 19th century, when the area was still largely undeveloped and defined more by sand paths than formal streets or infrastructure.

A caption on an early photographic negative identifies a nearby structure as the “Old Cliff House, Ocean Beach,” noting it burned in 1895 — an early reminder of how temporary many of these coastal buildings were.

According to San Diego coastal planning records and historic context documentation, Thomas’s shack sat at the base of the cliffs and functioned as both a residence and an informal stop for early travelers moving along the shoreline.

‘What the 250th anniversary means today … living under Trump.’ Rag writing contest second entry.

By Anonymous #2

On this 250th anniversary of our country, while being under the control of Donald Trump, I am reminded of those men and women who fought to allow the birth of this county in the first place: the original patriots.

I am reminded of patriot George Washington who understood the importance of healthcare within a military, thus mandated inoculations of the troops.

“The small pox has made such Head in every Quarter that I find it impossible to keep it from spreading thro’ the whole Army in the natural way. I have therefore determined, not only to innoculate all the Troops now here, that have not had it, but shall order Doc Shippen to innoculate the Recruits as fast as they come in to Philadelphia. They will lose no time, because they will go thro’ the disorder while their clothing Arms and accoutrements are getting ready.” – George Washington

I am reminded of patriot John Adams who understood, not just the importance of healthcare wtih a military, but of commerce and a country, thus advocated for universal healthcare with a government run system.

Editordude: This is the first entry in our Rag writing contest, a contest asking writers to express ‘What the nation’s 250 anniversary means today … living under Trump.’ Our panel of judges will determine the winner after the July 4th weekend; the contest runs until then and is open to anyone living in the City or County of San Diego. The winning essay will be awarded $100.00. (All entries will be published anonymously. Applicants should email us the essay to obragblog@gmail.com)

By Anonymous #1

“The arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward justice.” — Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

Philosophers, reformers and leaders often talk trajectory, making reference to progress like the kind seen in comforting movements of an arc. A line following that unfamiliar path ultimately expected to bend in the proper direction. So very appealing a concept – geometrically speaking.  A simple shape reassuringly capable of reflecting empirical truths.

Most of us have previously encountered the above famous quote, long attributed to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr, who included it in a 1956 speech addressing the Montgomery Bus Boycott. However, the original concept came from 19th century Unitarian minister and abolitionist Theodore Parker. In an 1853 sermon, Parker stated…”I do not pretend to understand the moral universe; the arc is a long one, my eye reaches but little ways…But from what I see I am sure it bends toward justice.”

By Danna Givot / Commentary SD Union-Tribune / June 27, 2026

If San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria and the City Council care — or even just wonder — why they’ve lost the public’s trust, they need look no further than their so-called “Technical Working Group” for Neighborhood Homes for All of Us.

What is the Technical Working Group? A secret group of “experts” hand-picked to develop site plans and four building designs (with up to 10 units each) for “single-family” zoned lots in San Diego’s neighborhoods.

Three years ago, the planning commissioners rejected San Diego’s Senate Bill 10 (SB 10) proposal, which would have allowed single-family homes to be replaced by 10-unit apartment buildings. To their credit, the commissioners recommended that community stakeholders have seats at the working group table when crafting the next iteration of infill housing in our single-family neighborhoods. I asked the Planning Department to give Neighbors For A Better San Diego a seat at that table but received no response. This was after two members of the Technical Working Group told me they were in the group, although the city’s deputy planning director told me days later that it had “not been formed.”

For the past year, I have repeatedly requested, via email and in person, data about this working group: its membership, mission, meeting dates, locations and minutes. Neither the planning director nor her deputy has answered my inquiries, even after they confirmed in their April 2026 Planning Department Update, that the Neighborhood Homes Technical Working Group met this March. A year after first requesting information about this body, it continues to operate secretly. I finally resorted to submitting a public records request for this material on May 30, but have received no information.

The city pretends to give the public a voice by inviting us to meaningless “focus groups” and useless “workshops” where we are told to place plastic housing cut-outs on mats with different sized lots. We are not allowed to ask questions — instead, we are told to submit inquiries to a website. I have been submitting questions to Planning Director Heidi Vonblum for a year without a meaningful response.

OB Rag Staff Report

Jack McGrory has seen a lot happen in San Diego over the past 50 years, and he knows a lot about how the city has evolved. In his 24 years at City Hall, where he rose from a trainee in 1973 to City Manager between 1991 and 1997, McGrory had a singular role in helping shape our city government.

At a June 20 dialogue hosted by the San Diego Community Coalition and Neighbors for a Better San Diego, McGrory answered questions about City Hall’s perilous state with astonishing candor.

In this Part I of a report on the forum [link], McGrory discussed how a lack of professionalism at City Hall has led to financial instability and public distrust.

Today, in Part II, he describes how concentrating political power in the executive branch has tipped the city into chaos.

On “strong mayor” government: When we went to district elections in 1988, the downtown business interests got pissed off. They thought: The neighborhoods will control the City Council, so how will we protect our interests? The next move was to go to a strong mayor, which happened in 2004. In a strong mayor government, you lose a professional corps of administrators who know how to do trash, water, and sewage. They know how to deliver services. It’s like running a business. Now look. I’ve had three goddamn trash cans in six months.

In the public sector, some employees are in a civil service classification that gives them protection, and some are “unclassified” – they are not protected, and they operate at a higher level. When I was city manager, I had about 25 unclassified employees. That number today is 432.

The San Diego Community Coalition publishes this email bulletin to keep our members and the general public informed about important Council hearings and other city public meetings.

Monday, June 29: City Council, 2:00 p.m.

Agenda:

Item S400: Proposed FY 2027 Recreation Center Fund Budgets, Opportunity Fund Budget, and 2025 Come Play Outside

Why it matters: Funding for city Rec Centers and the proportions of available funding that go to “low resource” neighborhoods continue to be an issue of concern.

Item S401: Information Guide on Group Participation Updates and Council Determination of Community Engagement Efforts

Why it matters: Community Planning Groups have seen their input on density and development issues greatly reduced under the Faulconer and Gloria regimes. The Community Planners Committee is demanding a “Seat at the Table” on important land use decisions. Background: