OB Rag

Associated Press – CBS8 / October 27, 2025

Nearly 42 million Americans who rely on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, referred to as SNAP, will not receive federal benefits next month.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed in a new notice that no SNAP funds will be distributed on Nov. 1. The news puts a strain on families across the country as the government shutdown drags on.

“Bottom line, the well has run dry,” the USDA notice says. “At this time, there will be no benefits issued November 01. We are approaching an inflection point for Senate Democrats.”

The government shutdown, now the second longest in U.S. history, has entered its fourth week with no end in sight. It’s not clear whether the pause in the program will shift anything in the negotiations to reopen the government.

However, the news of the SNAP benefits pause is leaving beneficiaries, states and food banks scrambling for ways to fill the gaps.

From Aguirre & Severson, LLP Law Firm

On Friday, October 24, San Diego County Judge James A. Mangione set the trial date of May 1, 2026, for the San Diego Superior Court lawsuit to void the trash tax San Diego City officials imposed on 224,000 San Diego homeowners. (Brown v. LaCava, case number 25CU025589C). Judge Mangione set the trial at least six days to try all the issues in the case.

San Diego homeowners, represented by attorneys at Aguirre & Severson, LLP, allege that the solid waste collection fee increases imposed by the City of San Diego violate California Constitution Article XIII(D) (The Right to Vote on Taxes Act). The alleged Constitutional violations are:

US Reps Vargas, Peters, Padilla, Jacobs and Levin Refused Entry

by City News Service – Times of San Diego / Oct. 27, 2025

A delegation of legislators representing San Diego County was once again refused entry to the Edward J. Schwartz United States Courthouse on Monday as they attempted to conduct oversight on an Immigrations and Customs Enforcement detention center.

Reps. Juan Vargas and Scott Peters, both San Diego Democrats, were refused entry a week ago. On Monday, they were joined by fellow Democratic Sen. Alex Padilla,, Rep. Sara Jacobs, and Rep. Mike Levin, and were again refused entry, the lawmakers said.

“As members of Congress, we have the right and the responsibility to enter detention sites in order to conduct oversight without prior authorization,” Vargas said.

“Today, we were again blocked from entering. If nothing is wrong here, why are we not allowed in? What is ICE hiding? We came here to confirm that the law is being followed.

By Lawrynce Cecio

A new grant proposal, approved by the County Board of Supervisors, seeks a $100 million state grant to construct a “behavioral health wellness campus.” The facility would be built on county-owned land in Point Loma next to the San Diego County Psychiatric Hospital, replacing a vacant complex on Rosecrans Street, with the capacity to serve approximately 20,000 people per year.

This proposal addresses an extreme and growing need. In the San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos Metro area, 323,000 people (11.6 percent of those aged 12 or older) were classified as having a substance use disorder in the past year; a rate higher than both California (9.6%) and the national average (9%).

The campus is designed to alleviate intense strain on local systems, where psychiatric units are consistently full and emergency departments are overcrowded. By offering integrated care for mental health and substance abuse, the facility aims to reduce hospital bed usage and dependence on law enforcement for crisis response.

By Joni Halpern

It is helpful growing old. The piling of decades of lived history and knowledge obtained over time gives a person a more holistic view of our national character. It becomes easier to see in today’s tapestry of American life the threads of earlier inclinations that resemble what we are now.

Today we are “cavalier,” a word that describes someone haughty or arrogant, someone with a careless disregard for serious matters.

We might have been described that way in our past as we annihilated the Native Americans; enslaved and brutalized Africans and their American-born descendants; exploited the Asian, European and Latin American immigrants who lived in poverty while staffing our factories and farms, or when we engaged in certain wars against
nations not out of necessity but out of our own hubris.

A new television pilot shot around Ocean Beach and featuring local musicians, “End of the 8”,  will have a public screening. It will be at The Harp — 4935 Newport Avenue in OB. Doors open at 6pm, screening at 8. Wednesday, October 29, 2025.

Editordude: This is another post as part of the Rag’s response to a U-T commentary about lifting the coastal 30 foot height limit.

by Judy Swink

It’s ironic that the writer of the Op-Ed is from La Jolla given that the campaign to create a 30’ coastal height limit for the City of San Diego began in La Jolla with outrage over construction of 939 Coast Blvd., the high rise towering above the coast near the Children’s Pool. It was La Jollans who put out the “call to arms”, joined by many other San Diegans, resulting in Proposition D, the citizens ballot initiative approved in 1972 by 63.06% (186,007) of voters citywide. Votes against were just 36.94% (108,968).

According to a 2022 piece in the OB Rag, 80% of voters in Ocean Beach and Pacific Beach voted in favor of Prop D.

Several amendments to the Coastal Height Limit Overlay Zone have been put to voters since 1972. In 1988, an amendment to allow restoration of the chimney and rooftop cupola of the 1915 Mission Brewery (Hancock @Washington St), voters agreed by 74.10%. In 1998, a different Prop. D to enable Sea World to exceed the 30-foot height limit (to a height not to exceed ½ the height of the Sea World Tower), squeaked by with 50.73% following misleading claims that approval would enhance Sea World’s programs for research and rescue of sea life.

From San Diego 350

Young people called on lawmakers, including SD Council President LaCava, to pass the Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act to protect schools and communities.

On Friday, October 24, over 1,000 students from 19 schools across San Diego and thousands from 50 California middle schools, high schools, and colleges walked out of class in a coordinated statewide action demanding that oil and gas companies be held accountable for the damage caused by their pollution.

Organized by youth climate groups and advocacy organizations including Youth v. Oil and SanDiego350 in partnership with the Make Polluters Pay campaign, the walkouts spanned San Diego County — with major events at Hilltop High School, Pacific Beach Middle School, University City High School, Eastlake High School, La Jolla High School, and Otay Ranch High School.

“Californians are already reeling from wildfires, floods, and extreme heat. We’re taking to the streets to demand passage of the Polluters Pay Climate Superfund Act to send a clear message that we won’t let Big Oil continue to destroy our futures,” said Diego Sandoval, senior at Eastlake HS in Chula Vista.

By Kate Callen

At an October 23 celebration of its legal win to suspend a 186-unit A Street project, the Golden Hill community received more good news: a 28th Street canyon parcel slated for development will remain open parkland.

The private owner has agreed to donate the property to Preserve Greater Golden Hill (PGGH), now incorporated as a 501c3. In exchange, he will receive a charitable tax deduction. San Diego Canyonlands is already working with the non-profit on a long-term rehabilitation and management plan to preserve the habitat.

More than 80 jubilant Golden Hill residents cheered the announcement at a PGGH fundraiser at Matteo’s at 30th and Juniper. Six months ago, as the Rag reported on May 22, the community felt blindsided by the two high-impact projects. Now, the canyon parcel is safe, and the eight-story complex is stalled.

In the wake of a Superior Court ruling that halted further construction at 2935-2961 A Street, PGGH will insist that Chicago-area developer CEDARst scale back the project to comply with the Greater Golden Hill Community Plan.

“The opposing counsel said the developer is open to negotiation,” said PGGH President Richard Santini. “We’re holding firm. We want three stories with 10 percent of the units affordable and some benefit to the community, like frontage and trees.”

Judge Joel Wohlfeil’s issuance of a temporary restraining order struck at the heart of Mayor Todd Gloria’s “Complete Communities” program, which allows massive “transit-oriented development” where planned transit stops do not yet exist and have not even secured actual funding.

By David Greenwald / Vanguard / October 21, 2025

SAN FRANCISCO – The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has moved to reconsider one of its most consequential rulings of the year, signaling potential full-court review in State of Oregon and City of Portland v. Donald J. Trump et al., a case testing the limits of presidential power to federalize a state’s National Guard over its governor’s objection.

On Monday, October 20, Circuit Judge Sidney R. Thomas, acting as En Banc Coordinator, issued an order stating that “a judge of this Court has sua sponte requested a vote on whether this case should be reheard en banc.”

The order directs all parties to file simultaneous supplemental briefs by midnight Pacific Time on Wednesday, October 22, 2025, addressing whether the case should be reheard before the full court. Each brief must not exceed 14,000 words.

The procedural move followed a divided three-judge panel’s decision earlier in the day lifting a lower court’s temporary restraining order that had blocked the Trump administration from deploying 200 federalized members of the Oregon National Guard to Portland.