OB Rag

On Tuesday this week, the Rag reported on yet another pedestrian death in the Midway District.

An unidentified male pedestrian was killed late Friday night, Nov. 14, when he ran across a street in the Midway District and was struck by a SUV. …The man was taken to a hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

Yes, the unfortunate pedestrian had run across the street against his light just before he was struck. He dearly paid for his mistake.

When we reported on the story, I cynically added:

So many pedestrians have been injured or killed in the Midway District over the last few years, there ought to be a chapter in the Book of Dead just on the Midway.

After publishing this, I got to thinking, that ‘yes, it does seem like there’s been a rash of pedestrian deaths and injuries from cars in the Midway of late.’ So I set out to investigate and rifled through OB Rag files and postings. The tragic following is what I found:

From SOHO Newsletter / Nov.-Dec. 2025

The rallying cry “Yes in My Backyard” sounds positive on the surface. Who wouldn’t want to be part of a movement that claims to champion housing, inclusion, and opportunity? But behind the slogan lies a harder truth. In practice, many in the YIMBY movement, which is primarily run by corporate and political players, are speaking in code, really saying: “Yes in Your Backyard.” This, in fact, is the unspoken rallying cry of developer- and investor-funded interests that push density, demolitions, and deregulation into other people’s neighborhoods while protecting their own assets, investments, and privilege.

The modern YIMBY movement may or may not have begun with good intentions, but in cities like San Diego it has been co-opted by the for-profit housing industry and developer/investor-funded nonprofits. These groups have learned that “YIMBY” makes an excellent disguise, one that cloaks profit-driven lobbying in the language of social good.

Under this banner, policies are being hyped that remove community voices, weaken environmental and historic protections, and fast-track demolition over rehabilitation. The result? The loss of our most walkable, sustainable, and affordable neighborhoods, the very communities that embody the kind of living urbanists support.

By Savannah Smith / The Point – LomaBeat / Nov 17, 2025

Point Loma Nazarene University’s Surf Team anticipates a strong season after taking first place in their opener at Black’s Beach last month.

The annual season opener, hosted by the University of California, San Diego’s Surf Team, took place from Oct. 25-26 and marked an exciting start to the year for the team. They competed against 31 collegiate teams and scored a total of 211 points, 63 points higher than any other team.

Sydney Ott, a third-year marketing major and returning team member, said it felt great to start the season with a win, especially after the team’s ninth national championship title win in June.

“Everyone was surfing super well, so it was awesome seeing us win as a team,” Ott said.

Leading up to the opener, the team held group practices at Mission Beach to prepare and get into the competition mindset.

“For me personally, I made sure to surf consistently leading up to the event and made sure that I had my board dialed in,” Ott said.

This preparation proved to be valuable once the contest began, as competitors were met with difficult conditions throughout the weekend.

Hundreds of Feet of Copper Wire Are Missing, for Example

By Geoff Page

The OB Pier is being surreptitiously cannibalized. The city knows about it. The city is unconcerned. The utter stupidity of city hall continues to amaze.

Recently, long time OB resident, Charles Landon, noticed something odd about the pier and investigated. He took some pictures that showed piping along the north side of the pier was missing. Two different diameter pipes that run along the outside of the north rail were cut and much of the large pipe was missing.

Landon took the pictures that appear in this story.

The smaller diameter pipe had carried electrical cables that ran out to the restaurant and powered the lights on the pier. The cables ran from the roof of the small building under the pier. The cables were cut at the roof and also at a small junction box under the pier, above the boardwalk.

Since the pier is closed and since the city decided to no longer light the pier at night, it might be logical for the city to cut the power source. It did not seem logical, however, that the city would remove all of the old copper wire.

By David Garrick / San Diego Union-Tribune / November 18, 2025

A sharply divided San Diego City Council voted 6-3 Tuesday to approve annual parking passes for Balboa Park that are intended to allow frequent park users to avoid daily and hourly parking fees coming in January.

The council’s approval of the permits, which will cost $100 a year for city residents and $300 a year for nonresidents, comes after city officials retreated last week from much higher prices proposed initially.

Council members who voted in favor called the lower rates a good compromise and stressed that Mayor Todd Gloria and his staff had made many concessions this year to the council and frequent park users.

Council members who voted against the permit fees — Stephen Whitburn, Raul Campillo and Vivian Moreno — criticized the entire idea of parking fees in Balboa Park.

Their comments echoed complaints from three dozen clubs and other organizations in the park focused on dance, gardening, beekeeping, model railroading, playing bridge and other activities.

During the city council hearing Tuesday afternoon, November 18, a discussion was held about charging residents and non-residents for parking at San Diego beaches and at Mission Bay Park. Former city council member Donna Frye observed the hearing and participated by phone. She filed this exclusive report for the Rag this morning, the 19th.

Non-Resident Paid Parking at Our Beaches and Mission Bay Park Does Not Move Forward as a Revenue Option- For Now

By Donna Frye

On November 18, the city council did not include the proposal for non-residents to pay a fee to park at our beaches and Mission Bay Park as a revenue option. Therefore, it was not part of the council resolution being sent to the mayor’s office for consideration in preparing the FY 2027 budget.

Oddly, there was almost no discussion at the council meeting about the paid parking proposal or the decision by the mayor to enact a revenue audit moratorium on the Mission Bay Park leases for nine months.

Councilmember Campillo was the only one who spoke at any length about the paid parking and made it very clear that he would not support charging residents or non-residents to park at Mission Bay Park or our beaches.

By John Ziebarth / Op-Ed SD Union-Tribune / November 18, 2025 

The progress of Midway Rising, the massive Sports Arena redevelopment project with a potential price tag of $3.9 billion, has been a history of bait-and-switch tactics.

[Please go to original here for any and all links.]

On July 15, 2022, the San Diego City Council cleared the way for Proposition C to allow voters to remove the 30-foot height limit in the Midway/Pacific Highway Community Plan. Members approved the Supplemental Environmental Impact Report analyzing the effects of a 65-foot-high development. A judge had required the additional analysis to address deficiencies in the original environmental documents. At the hearing, a council member stated that the 65-foot height limit in the zoning code/community plan would be the cap if Proposition C passed.

Two months later, on Sept. 13, at Mayor Todd Gloria’s behest, the council selected Midway Rising with a proposed 86-foot height limit (not 65 feet) for the mixed-use portion of the Sports Arena project. Prior to the Proposition C vote, Midway Rising was asked at the Point Loma Association if it would go above 86 feet if offered several million dollars for an ocean-view unit on the 20th floor. A representative responded that its proposal was for 86 feet in height.

by Kevin Sullivan / Times of San Diego / Nov. 3, 2025

San Diego City Council Resolution 280194 of June 1992 declared the city would not develop Montgomery-Gibbs airport for the full range of general aviation aircraft nor pursue a strategy leading to commercial or passenger services. The city’s Airports Advisory Committee is now proposing projects that may nullify this resolution.

The cleverly worded Airport Master Plan proposal to “remove the displaced threshold on runway 28R” will expand the airport so more, larger, heavier and noisier planes can operate from there. The proposal’s wording disguises the actual meaning which is to relocate the runway’s landing area 1,077 feet farther East.

This is what the council stopped in 1992 — building a longer runway. The neighborhoods of Navajo, Allied Gardens and Grantville are under the flight path.

Moving the landing area farther east may also mean passenger planes on approach are in closer proximity to the power lines that caused the tragic May 2025 crash in Murphy Canyon that killed six people.

By Mandy Havlik

Electric bicycles are transforming transportation but without clear rules and a strong safety framework, they are also making our streets more dangerous, especially for children. It’s common to see young riders without helmets, e-bikes speeding down sidewalks, and parents startled by close calls at intersections, school zones, and neighborhood walkways. The increasing frequency of these incidents is not just alarming, it is unacceptable.

Other cities in our region have taken decisive action. Poway, Chula Vista, Encinitas and Santee have all adopted e-bike regulations that establish clearer guidelines and elevate safety expectations. These cities recognize what San Diego has not yet acted upon; that e-bikes operated by untrained or underage riders pose real risks. As the largest city in the region, San Diego should not be trailing behind its neighbors in safeguarding its residents. It is time for our city to adopt the commonsense approaches outlined in California State Assembly Bill 2234 and implement them locally.

By Paul Krueger / Times of San Diego / Nov. 17, 2025

Five years after Home Depot’s corporate office announced the construction of a new superstore in Mission Valley, the concrete behemoth is rising from the dust on Camino del Rio South just east of Texas Street.

You can see the project move toward completion as you zoom along Interstate 8. The steel-and-concrete girders closest to the freeway are the backbone of the store’s 155,000-square-foot parking structure. That’s actually bigger than the store and its garden center with 125,000 square feet of shopping space.

This colossus will become the dominant structure on the disappearing south rim of Mission Valley. But who exactly will it serve?

There is no housing of any kind along this stretch of Camino del Rio South or even close by. Home Depot executives reportedly believe the new superstore will be a magnet for customers who live up the hill in Normal Heights, North Park, Hillcrest, and adjoining neighborhoods.

Audits Suspended for 9 Months in Summer of 2024 Due to ‘Backlog’

By Jeff McDonald / San Diego Union-Tribune / November 18, 2025

Bookkeeping practices at San Diego City Hall were so muddled that officials last year stopped auditing Mission Bay percentage leases, the lucrative rental agreements that direct a portion of tenants’ profits to the public treasury, an independent report has found.

The decision by Mayor Todd Gloria and his aides to suspend routine oversight of bayfront leases for nine months raised the city’s risk of losing money at the same time it was confronting major shortfalls in revenue.

It also prevented San Diego from imposing late fees and other penalties on tenants that failed to pay rent on time or otherwise meet the terms of their leases, the City Auditor’s Office reported.

Is This a Quixotic Move by City in Efforts to Eliminate the 30-foot Height Limit? State Appellate Court Ruled that 2022 Ballot Measure Was Illegally Placed Before Voters

By Jennifer Van Grove / The San Diego Union-Tribune / November 18, 2025 

San Diego will ask the state’s highest court to keep intact a 2022 ballot measure, recently deemed illegal, that sought to eliminate the 30-foot height limit from the Midway District.

Monday, San Diego City Council members voted 6 to 2 in closed session to authorize a petition for review to the Supreme Court of California.

The decision comes one month after the city lost, on appeal, a lawsuit to environmental advocacy group Save Our Access, which contested the legality of the ballot measure, known as Measure C.

In October, California’s 4th District Court of Appeal determined that the city violated California’s Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA, when it put the ballot measure in front of voters before sufficiently studying the environmental impacts of taller buildings. The three-judge panel decision, in favor of plaintiff Save Our Access, directed the trial court to issue a writ of mandate, which would invalidate the ordinance and restore the 30-foot height limit in the Midway District.

The ruling could have devastating implications for new development in a part of town city leaders have said has been hamstrung by the 53-year-old building height restriction.