Straight Talk on City of San Diego from Jack McGrory, Part I

OB Rag Staff Report

Jack McGrory has seen a lot happen in San Diego over the past 50 years, and he knows a lot about how the city has evolved. In his 24 years at City Hall, where he rose from a trainee in 1973 to City Manager between 1991 and 1997, McGrory had a singular role in helping shape our city government.

At a June 20 dialogue hosted by the San Diego Community Coalition and Neighbors for a Better San Diego, McGrory answered questions about City Hall’s perilous state with astonishing candor.

In this Part I of a report on the forum, McGrory discusses how a lack of professionalism at City Hall has led to financial instability and public distrust.

On city government “best practices”:

We always measured ourselves against other large cities. All the city managers would meet every six months, and we’d exchange ideas about best practices. San Diego went to automated trash pickup because I saw Phoenix doing it, and they showed me their numbers. Before we had automated pickup, we had two or three people on every truck handling 11 tons of trash a day. The costs of back injuries and workers’ comp were insane.

At another one of these conferences, someone described a new technology for fixing potholes that used trucks with computers and hot tar dispensers. The truck would drive over the pothole, and the computer would drop the hot tar and tamp it down. I bought eight pothole trucks, and we were fixing potholes in 24 hours.

Then one day, I saw a city employee fixing a pothole by shoveling in hot tar. I asked, “Where are the pothole trucks?” He said, “One of the drivers got carpal tunnel syndrome, so the union lobbied the Council, and they got rid of the trucks.”

Joe La Cava recently reported in a newsletter that the City has gotten responses to pothole repair requests down to eight days [more than seven times longer than during McGrory’s tenure]. And the Mayor recently announced at a press conference that the City has gotten streetlight repairs down to a 2-year backlog.

Photos by Paul Kruger

On city compensation practices:

When I was manager, our compensation practices compared to other cities in the county were number one, especially on police and fire. Now I think we’re near the bottom. That creates a situation where people don’t want to stay. The City Hall staff increases have taken up a lot of San Diego’s very limited revenue. They have prioritized staff and special programs over taking care of employees in terms of compensation. There are 300 vacant positions in the Police Department, which is crazy.

On municipal tax practices:

After Prop 13 passed, a lot of California cities adopted a utility tax on water, sewer, cable, cell phone bills, all of it. Outside of San Diego, you’ll see a surcharge of 5 to 10 percent on the bottom of those bills. L.A. is now up to 12 percent. We have zero. Our business taxes aren’t even worth collecting. Businesses are getting away scot-free in this town. They aren’t paying anywhere near their fair share.

On trash fees:

San Diego has been the only city in the state that doesn’t collect trash fees. I took that measure to the Council 24 times, and I was 0 for 24. So I was happy when they did that. But they screwed it up badly. When I was city manager, I would make different departments compete against the private sector. And our trash crews won two of those competitions. But we don’t do that now. They built into the trash fees that collection has to be provided by city employees, so there’s no incentive to be competitive.

On service cuts and fee increases:

I think Todd has been trying to piss us all off so we would be induced to vote for a tax increase. Why close the restrooms at the beaches? And the savings are peanuts. The budget cuts this year are 6.1 percent of the General Fund. For a private sector CEO – and I’ve been one for 30 years – you can do that in your sleep. And there was no political calculus that went into it. Why would you charge for parking at Balboa Park, raise $7 million in a $2.2 billion budget, make everybody in this city angry, and cause a 35-percent reduction in attendance at museums? There was no cost-benefit analysis.

On infrastructure:

The communities that grew in the ‘80s and early ‘90s were north of I-8, and we made the developers pay for everything. So north of 8, you’ve got landscaped streets, great libraries, great parks. South of 8 didn’t have that funding mechanism because there wasn’t that much growth south of 8. So we created 13 redevelopment areas, and every neighborhood south of 8 had one. Then Jerry Brown decided in 2012 that redevelopment had gone far enough, cities were abusing it, and he got rid of it, which got rid of the funding for poorer communities. On top of that, we had a Council policy that one-third of sales tax money went to infrastructure. But the City got rid of that and moved the money into the General Fund.

In Part II of “Straight Talk from Jack McGrory,” to be published on Monday, June 29, the former city manager explains how concentrating political power in the executive branch has tipped San Diego into chaos.

Staff
Author: Staff

6 thoughts on “Straight Talk on City of San Diego from Jack McGrory, Part I

  1. “They built into the trash fees that collection has to be provided by city employees, so there’s no incentive to be competitive.”

    They slipped that into the ordinance. But the city charter allows for outsourcing and prevails over an ordinance. Despite what they say, the city can require competition and outsource to a private company.

  2. I’m glad Mr. McGrory mentioned the fact SDPD is short staffed. However I wonder when the last time sworn personnel was counted? I googled population of SD CA=1.41 Million and total of 1,822 sworn PD personnel. Dallas TX has population of 1.33 Million, and a total of PD Personnel of, 3,100-3,222 and 1,200-1,500 patrol officers. Here’s the problem…. SD is counting ALL PD sworn (cops) employees, which would include Detectives in Area Command Stations, AND all the Specialized units, like Homicide, Vice, SWAT, Narcotics, Gangs, Robbery, Child Abuse, DV, Elder Abuse, Lieutenants, Captains, Chiefs, who don’t do patrol. I have no idea how many SWORN employees in all those specialized units that should be deducted from the total of 1,800 SWORN officers because they don’t do patrol. SD is probably looking at 700-900 Sworn patrol officers to work 3 shifts, 10hr. days, 4 days a week in a spread out City. And I’ve heard the Fire Dept. is short staffed too. The short answer is SD is woefully short staffed in PD, and FD, but there’s money for Promenades, bike lanes, parks, and this mayor reportedly has 147 staff members just in his office, then each of the Council Reps, has a flock of staff members. This is what a strong mayor form of government got the voters. He can do whatever he wants to do with the tax payers money. But safety in numbers does not count for PD or the FD.

  3. Just as DJT has succeeded in making George W. Bush look like a great president, Mayor Toddy has done a lot to make the Council/Manager government under McGrory seem like the halcyon days of yore.

    1. Right?!! Exactly. Plus he’s done a lot to make some think bringing back Republican councilmembers is a good thing, forgetting all that happened during a sleuth of GOP mayors (Golding, Sanders, Faulconer). What’s the answer? Independent, grassroots candidates beholden to no one but their constituents. Rocking the local Democratic Party leadership to wake up, maybe getting the clique that runs it to move along.

  4. A council/manager form of government is not necessarily a panacea for large cities like San Diego, especially when your elected officials are term limited. All that does is enhance the power and influence of an unelected city staff. I share this as a supporter of and someone who has worked in council/manager governments at the executive level.

    My perception is that much of the staff to our local elected officials are young talented professionals who have a passion for the work they do. However, many lack the depth of experience that comes with tenure. That’s intended as an observation, not a criticism.

    As a result, what might be otherwise worthy ideas aren’t fully vetted for potentially unintended adverse consequences. This has certainly been the case with the city’s efforts to expand areas subject to paid parking. It’s also true of the setting of the city’s trash collection rates. And, the earlier version of what were exceedingly lax ADU regulations.

    The City needs to slow down and take the time necessary to fully examine its choices, their potential results, and the political context which surrounds them. Exercise genuine due diligence.

    I do understand the sense of urgency that rises from a city budget that is getting harder and harder to balance, but the structural deficit the City faces is going to require years of very hard and unpleasant work. Quick fix solutions in the face of a citizenry that feels tapped out isn’t going to build trust and confidence in our community leadership.

    In the end, it’s not the form of government that counts, it’s the people we elect and the people they appoint to help them that makes the difference.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *