Ocean Beach Was Specifically Targeted for Over-Development by San Diego Planners — Oppose This Plan Today at City Hall

See Talking Points for Today’s Hearing Below

It’s true, the community of Ocean Beach was specifically and intentionally targeted by city planners for over-development. How they did this was by including a specific reference to OB’s historic district in a so-called package of “reforms” that would eliminate any historical protections against over-development the district provides for Ocean Beach.

This reference to undermine OB’s Emerging Cottage Historic District is included in an awkward bungling of proposals under the rubric of Preservation Reforms Package A that is headed to the City Council today, Feb. 24th.

The threats of over-development would come from Mayor Gloria’s “Complete Communities” which allows for higher density and a loosening of requirements, such as the 30-foot height limit, parking, set-backs and other restrictions on project developments. If OB’s Historic District is undermined, then OB is susceptible to the ravages of  Complete Communities.

Here’s some background as to how we got here.

The OB’s Historic District was the reason a project called The Point and consisting of 24 units slated for Point Loma Avenue in south OB was unanimously rejected in August of 2024 by the San Diego Planning Commission. The developers were using Complete Communities to obtain exemptions from long-held restrictions if they met certain requirements.

Because there appeared to be a legal conflict between the Complete Communities plan and the Municipal Code, the commissioners approved the denial of the project.  . However, at the end of the hearing, Vice Chair Matthew Boomhower, the most developer-friendly commissioner who was chairing the meeting, had to say in his closing remarks:

(to city staff) I hope you take this as an opportunity to change the Municipal code. I think it is a great project. Normally, I and the rest of this commission would have wholeheartedly supported it and denied the appeal.

So, city staff apparently took Commissioner Boomhower’s advice and came up with a recommendation a year later to get around OB’s protection. They came up with a proposed change to the Land Development Code that would “fix” this for the city. The Municipal Code they wanted to change is §143.1002 entitled “Application of Complete Communities Housing Solutions Regulations.”

In 2024, what saved OB from The Point over-development project was a section of this municipal code that allows certain exemptions; a sub-section says “The regulations in this Division shall not apply to the following types of development, ” and then sub-section (6), among others, which states, “Development located within a designated historical district or subject to the Old Town San Diego Planned District.”

So, here was the conflict — the code exempted any “designated historical district” from the rules of Complete Communities. Period. But staff fixed the proposed language for subsection (6) to state:

(6) Development located within a designated historical district or subject to the Old Town San Diego Planned District., with the following exceptions:

(A) Development on properties that are not designated as contributing resources to the Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historical District;

The specific wording of the new language in the so-called reforms proposes the removal of most of Ocean Beach’s protection from the mayor’s Complete Communities plan with this: “(A) Development on properties that are not designated as contributing resources to the Ocean Beach Cottage Emerging Historical District.”

One of the arguments the city staff used in 2024 was that the building on the site was not designated as a “contributing resource” to OB’s Cottage Emerging Historical District. There was no basis for their argument then but this change fixes that problem.\

Here are some talking points to use during today’s hearing, which won’t begin until after 2 pm in City Hall:

Talking Points

OB has an Historical District due to:

  • Several hundreds of cottages built since the 1880s;
  • The historic nature of OB is undisputed; the entire community is historic, not just single lots.
  • Application for an historic district designation was filed with the state Department of Parks and Recreation on June 2, 1999.
  • Residents and property owners have relied on this designation for over a quarter of a century.
  • OB needs some protections as it is already one of the densest communities in San Diego, what with smaller than usual lot sizes, rear yard homes, and multiple apartments.
  • 70-80% of OB residents are renters; OB is not some all-white rich exclusive neighborhood made up entirely of single-family homes.

Package A was opposed by the following:

  • San Diego’s Historic Resource Board – the very board that oversees the designation of historic buildings and neighborhoods voted against it.
  • The Community Planners Committee (CPC) — the body made up of representatives of all the city’s community planning committees — opposed it.
  • The Ocean Beach Planning Board voted against Package A.

The City never completed a survey of all the different historic cottages within the neighborhood of  Ocean Beach.

  • The city wants to limit the historic protections just to the 72 cottages identified as historic.
  • Local historians estimate there may be up to 300 such cottages within OB.
  • Now the city wants to benefit from its lack of follow-through with a survey of all the cottages, and exempt the entire community from preservation.
  • Usually historical districts protect the entire neighborhood from over-development to save the community’s character.
  • City planners want only the 72 cottages to be protected and allow over-development on the very next lot.

Proposed “Reforms” will benefit developers, not neighborhoods

See SOHO’s Action Alert:

For all these reasons, the future of OB is on the table today. Please attend in person, on Zoom, or comment via the city’s website.

A former lawyer and current grassroots activist, I have been editing the Rag since Patty Jones and I launched it in Oct 2007. Way back during the Dinosaurs in 1970, I founded the original Ocean Beach People’s Rag - OB’s famous underground newspaper -, and then later during the early Eighties, published The Whole Damn Pie Shop, a progressive alternative to the Reader.

5 thoughts on “Ocean Beach Was Specifically Targeted for Over-Development by San Diego Planners — Oppose This Plan Today at City Hall

  1. S.O.S. Please help save O.B. from over-development TODAY! Save our Beach Town, and its incredible history! Please attend in person, on Zoom, or comment via the city’s website.

  2. You covered it well. There is no good reason to be pushing this through. They should at least wait until their entire policy can be evaluated in whole. I sent this to councilmembers:

    The OB Cottage Emerging District was created in 2000. The city published the historic district boundary maps and charged all building permit applicants within the boundary to determine if their home was a contributing resource.  The historic district boundary provided protections against certain density incentives, to preserve the overall integrity of the district.  

    Last year DSD approved a Complete Communities project in OB in direct conflict with the municipal code language. When citizens and the local CPG complained, city staff began editing the website and deleting maps in an apparent effort to remove any protections for the OB district.  Citizens appealed the project and the Planning Commision granted the appeal based on the clear language of the municipal code prohibiting Complete Communities projects within historic districts.
     
    The Package A is in response to this, targeting the OB Cottage District to officially erase its long-standing historic protections.  The city’s basis is that the OB district is incomplete because a survey of all properties in the district was never done.  In the 1990s, city staff performed a preliminary “windshield survey” that estimated 300 cottages that may qualify for historic designation.  However, it is city staff’s responsibility to complete the surveys and identify all contributing resources.  That has not been done.  The planning dept lists 13 historic districts in process and OB is not one of them.

    The 2002 HRB policy shows the following definition: 
    “EMERGING HISTORICAL DISTRICT: This type of District includes a group of resources related to one another in a clearly distinguishable way with related character, theme, architectural styles, development period, or other characteristics within a geographically identifiable area which could one day cumulatively develop sufficient concentrations to bring it the level of a Geographic/Traditional or Thematic Historic District.”

    With this change, Ocean Beach’s historic district will be in-name-only, it will provide no protections.   The city needs to complete the survey.  In the meantime, Package A should not single out Ocean Beach, as it may prevent OB from ever having protections even with a full survey.  Instead, the code language should address the districts by type:

    “Complete Communities shall not apply in Historic Districts, except for Emerging or Thematical districts where a site survey has not been completed.”
    The Historic Resources Board did NOT support Package A.  City council should not move this forward.  Please seek out further HRB input and address this in a cohesive fashion with any “Package B” amendments.

  3. They can make So OB look just like Miami Beach except there isn’t much beach on So OB. Some cliffs with a hike down to a small beach but mostly just cliffs hence the name sunset cliffs. The road also sees a lot of traffic at sunset time. My guess is the developers don’t live in the area. But it probably will make a lot more work for the life guards and cliff rescues.
    Not a good place for a large scale development.

  4. Please, figure it out. The city doesn’t make it easy. Please watch it on video, if nothing else. You will see our future in buzz words and building. Use Google, for City Council San Diego Agenda, which might take you to:

    https://sandiego.hylandcloud.com/211agendaonlinecouncil/Meetings/ViewMeeting?id=6870&doctype=1&site=council

    Scroll down to Item 332 and keep clicking. The city website is convoluted for new users of it. If you are able to zoom and comment, GREAT! Someone may count the numbers, even if they don’t listen.

Leave a Reply to Kathleen Blavatt Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *