Before the community of Point Loma says adios to that patch of dirt along Famosa and near Nimitz — that’s been called various names over the years, like the “Famosa Pump Track” and more recently “Famosa Canyon” — there has to be some kind of reckoning with its history.
Here is an edited version of Katie Mae B’s “Some History of the Dirt & Kids at the Famosa Pump Track – With Plenty of Questions Remaining,” posted on the Rag March 19, 2019.
At the Famosa Open Space pump track, what makes it a perfect place is “the dirt,” — The unique mix of dirt, sand and organic materials,” locals say. Two of these locals have been active in Famosa Open Space pump track at different points over a few decades and with the same core group. Now [in 2019] they are a part of the larger group working together to save the whole space.
Here is a small snapshot in the infinite time span over which Famosa Open Space has existed in its current state.
Who knows what was here before 1909!
What we do know is that it’s all about the dirt. Environmental engineers hired in 2018 to do a report for the San Diego Housing Commission (SDHC) agreed the area was special and said it was the ‘cleanest urban open space they had ever seen’; but since they were ‘not hired to determine that’ it’s not going to be in their report.
The Pump Track has a long and organic history and its evolution has always stemmed from the ingenuity of children.

In the 1990s the “bike kids” found asphalt chunks discarded on the side of Nimitz that they could use for a base. The dirt coated them perfectly to make those first mounds for jumping. That small run under the trees evolved into a massive track that took up most of the open space. At its’ height in the late 90s, the pump tracks saw pro-riders perfecting their tricks before their debut at the X Games, just down the street at SeaWorld.
Then one morning it was gone.
In 2012 a group of new and old “bike kids” – now with their own kids – found another organic track opportunity. When the SDHC landscapers came through to chop down all the bamboo in the valley and the dirt covered over the bamboo stumps, another pump track evolved. The kids all enjoyed riding and were thrilled! They loved digging and improving the mounds after the rains. Until they woke up one morning and it was gone.
But this time was different.
A group of extremely dedicated locals started to work with the City. One of them spent a lot of time downtown talking to City officials. He prevailed and they were offered the opportunity to rent the space at a rate of $1/month. They were thrilled!
They organized. They had a non-profit to back them. They lined up insurance. They had the pump track plans drawn up. Then the City informed them they needed an Environmental Impact Report and it would cost them $5000. The City hadn’t provided them a rental agreement yet, so what happened once they paid for the EIR? Who did they send it to? No one they talked to in the City offices had any idea what they were talking about. Thus, they found themselves at a dead end.
Thankfully we do have DC Collier’s wishes memorialized in the City’s 1909 Ordinance. It states, in part, that this space should be for the children to use. But for the City’s vote to rezone. But for the SDHC transferring funds to the San Diego Housing Authority so the SDHA could purchase the land using the Gas Tax fund. Why didn’t the SDHC purchase it themselves? As the documents show, the City’s Charter banned the SDHC. But for all these actions decades ago, this land would be exempt from any housing mandates.
A year after the last bobcat was sent to “destroy the pump track” on March 19, 2018. A few upset parents were alerted & showed up in time. If they had to ‘evict’ others to clean up that area of space, then they had to evict us sitting on the track. The crew left. Now, the damage has been repaired and the children are once again thrilled. Thank you to everyone who spent hundred of volunteer hours helping!!
I asked the locals if they knew why the SDHC has been so determined to destroy the track. I had personally seen the work order last year – it said “destroy the pump track” and “take pictures when done”. They both said liability. They had heard, as many of us have, that years ago someone had been badly hurt and their family sued the city for millions. Well, that makes sense right? But it is not true.
The SDHC recently confirmed, via their Public Records response, that that story is urban legend. To be clear – the City has NOT had any injuries reported, lawsuits or other claims of liability over this space to date. They clarify that they fear the “potential” for liability. Lucky for them, and us, California Government Code Section 831.7 (also known as Recreational Use Law) insulates government agencies from being liable for an individual’s injury during recreational use of open space. The real liability begins when this space is no longer used “as is” or if it ceases to be City owned. Buyer beware!

One can’t help but wonder why the City’s “powers that be” do not do more to support the community? Why don’t they act to stop the SDHC’s bullying actions? Why don’t they have the trespassing signs removed, especially considering they have the wrong phone number? Why don’t the children have a right to use this open space while they “explore” their options? There has been no shortage to the amount of questions arising this past year.








The Pump Track isn’t within the boundaries of what Collier Park is today or any historical boundary of what once was Collier Park.
The Collier Park overlay maps are posted in prior articles of yours.
Its old Native Indian Kumeyaay territory sacred land. If they have not told you that yet then its possible they never wanted anyone to know because they want to build and profit. Simple as that. I really like the area and walking through there always made me feel at peace until they put the no trust passing signs. growing up here its been one of the few untouched pieces of land that has history that I don’t think anyone has realized passed there own lifetimes. There is a reason its so beautiful and that’s because it was designed with perfection of nature. To me it would.be the equivalent of putting housing on the famous slough wetlands a block away.
That land was part of what Collier deeded to the city as park land. The only area called Collier Park is on west side of Nimitz. Cleator Park across Famosa was par of that deeded property. Referring to the whole bequest as Collier Park is incorrect.
Mr. Page, this article tries to associate the location of the pump track to the 60 acres Collier donated. The pump track is not located withing those boundaries – and there are at least 4 different maps posted on this site that show those 60 deeded acres end at 117°14’08.4″W, leaving MOST of the site owned by the San Diego Housing Commission OUTSIDE of those bounds, INCLUDING the Pump Track.
If it was proved it was originally Native Kumeyaay land used for old way purposes like making food or cooking for where the canyon is would that have significants or does that not matter? What would be the historical significants in that case senario? Would native Americans need to have a say so in that case?
I gotta say, just like I always say how I never see any bikers on 30th, I NEVER see any kids on that pump track and I’m in the area farely regularly. I bet you could build a pump track parallel to nimitz right along that chain link fence, especially down closer to West Point Loma. That’d be a huge win for everyone! More kids in the neighborhood with these 72 ACTUALLY affordable units we all agree we desperately need plus a new, safer place for kids to bike (there’s no fence by famosa canyon, it’s an accident waiting to happen).
Doesn’t the plan maintain the pump track? See this image on the OBRag’s previous post (#10 in the image): https://obrag.org/2025/01/update-on-72-units-coming-to-famosa-canyon-locals-still-not-happy/
I still believe that filing a lawsuit over how the land was originally removed from the Collier donation would be the best way of halting this project. If that earlier deal to sell the land could be shown as illegal, as it was, the project could not be done.
Why bother filing a lawsuit? Isn’t 100% affordable housing what is not only needed but what the OB Rag is for? Isn’t that progressive? There is a large park across the street so losing the open space isn’t exactly a huge loss for the community.
Given all the insane fires going on in LA, does it really make sense to have lots of overgrown open space near urban areas like this? Seems like a fire hazard.
I spent many weekends digging and riding there in ’98. People from all over the country would stop by and ride. The X Games were held in SD in ’98 and many of the pros came out and rode the “OB Trails” as they were called during that period. Sad to see such a great piece of San Diego BMX history be destroyed by bureaucrats that will never know what the OB Trails meant to many of us.