Regulators Cover for Edison: “No One at Fault”
The announcement on July 19th by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) stating that Southern California Edison (SCE) – the owner of the San Onofre Nuclear Power station – had complied will all regulations is yet another dangerous case of regulators looking the other way coupled with gutted unsafe regulations, according to local anti-nuke activist groups. The groups include Residents Organized for a Safe Environment (ROSE), Citizens’ Oversight, and the Peace Resource Center of San Diego.
Listen to the activists:
Carol Jahnkow of the Peace Resource Center of San Diego:
“It’s a very sad commentary when regulatory agencies will allow transgressions to occur and will not speak out about them, to avoid scrutiny themselves.”
Ray Lutz, Coordinator of Citizens’ Oversight:
“Either the regulations were insufficient and followed or sufficient but not followed, you can’t have both. Our regulatory process must safeguard against radiation leaks, emergency shutdowns, and $670 million steam generators failing within months of installation. To say that nothing is wrong takes the cake.”
The ruling is absolutely astonishing, but unfortunately not surprising to those watching the process since any admission by NRC that the regulations were not followed would mean that they were asleep at the wheel, allowing SCE to flout the regulations to avoid a costly (but much safer) license amendment process including public and NRC review.
Activists believe that any restart prior to CPUC determination of the cost effectiveness for the ratepayer is premature. Ratepayers should not be financially responsible for this debacle.
Gene Stone of ROSE stated – repeating a scenario described by nuclear industry expert Arnie Gundersen -:
“California Edison’s plan to restart reactor number two is extremely risky. Any restart could result is a cascading blowout, one tube influencing the next, and may even progress to a meltdown.”
NRC officials said that there would be no restart without public meetings and that SCE has not filed a response to the NRC action as of yet. Victor Dricks, Public Affairs Officer of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission / Region IV Arlington, in Texas, stated:
“The NRC plans to hold several more public meetings in the vicinity of the plant before making any decision about restart of either of the San Onofre reactors.”
The NRC covered for Edison at the June 18 public meeting as well, saying that the cause of the failure was excessive steam velocity without digging back to the ultimate root cause. Edison’s many design changes are the obvious culprit, with NRC officials watching from start to finish, never speaking up to force SCE to use the normal license amendment process.
Activists say they are planning protest activities in response to this stunning coverup by the NRC and SCE.
For more info, contact the following:
Peace Resource Center of San Diego; Carol Jahnkow / carolj@igc.org / 760-390-077
Citizens’ Oversight ; Ray Lutz / RayLutz@CitizensOversight.org / 619-820-5321 http://ShutDownSanOnofre.org
Residents Organizing for a Safe Environment (ROSE) Gene Stone / genston@sbcglobal.net / 949-233-7724
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
I agree. It’s especially insulting considering Arnie Gundersen’s analysis is not a secret. Just say “computer simulation”, blame it on a computer, and ignore the liberties taken with the steam generator design.
I’m trying to figure out if the NRC’s replacement for Jaszko (sp?) will step up to the plate. She might be the new guy, or gal, on the commission, but she’s replacing the only commissioner who spoke up for safety.
{ 1 trackback }