One Company Owns San Diego’s CBS, KUSI, Fox and CW Affiliates

For a Mere $6.2 billion, Nexstar Bought Tegna, Which Owned CBS 8 Affiliate and The CW

By Teri Figueroa / The San Diego Union-Tribune / March 20, 2026

Questions and anxiety deepened in some of San Diego’s TV stations Friday, a day after the federal government approved a deal that puts the region’s FOX, CBS and CW affiliates, plus KUSI, under the same ownership.

It’s not clear what the ownership changes could mean for San Diego’s TV news landscape. It’s also unclear what the changes mean for viewers of the stations’ non-news programming. It appeared KUSI had aired some CW programming Thursday and Friday evenings, and the logo displayed on KUSI’s Friday afternoon newscast read “KUSI San Diego CW.”

Nexstar Media Group Inc. on Thursday closed a $6.2 billion acquisition of Tegna after the Federal Communications Commission and the Department of Justice approved the deal. The combination gives Nexstar and partners 265 television stations in 44 states and the District of Columbia, ultimately reaching 80% of households, the company said.

In San Diego, Nexstar already owned Fox affiliate KSWB and independent station KUSI. Tegna’s local stations included CBS affiliate KFMB and The CW. On Friday, leadership from the local stations either could not be reached for comment or did not respond to an emailed request for comment. One station referred questions to a Nexstar spokesperson, who did not respond to an email seeking comment.

A staffer at one of the local stations, who asked not to be named for fear of jeopardizing their job, said there has been a lot of uncertainty, and morale is low as people fear the possibility that layoffs could be looming.

A memo Friday from Nexstar CEO Perry Sook to employees, viewed by the Union-Tribune, said the day marked “an important and historic milestone” for the company.

“Together, we have an exciting array of assets in the U.S. focused on creating and delivering local content to the communities we serve, backed by the resources and collective vision necessary to adapt to the realities of a rapidly changing media environment,” it reads. “Our future is filled with both threats to our business and opportunities to continue to evolve our company to not only survive those threats but to thrive.”

Point Loma Nazarene University journalism professor Dean Nelson said he sees the acquisition as “capitalism at work.”

“I personally would not set my hair on fire over this, but it does show there are fewer voices in the broadcast world than ever,” he said about local news. “But there are fewer viewers than ever.”

Such acquisitions have the potential to limit the number of legacy media voices, Nelson said, “but those voices were diminishing in their influence and importance anyway.” He noted that people are getting news from other places, primarily social media, and said that while legacy media works to vet and verify information, “social media sites have no such constraints.”

Fewer local journalists and smaller newsrooms are “out there telling us what is happening in our communities and holding powerful people accountable,” Nelson said. And having fewer journalists, “in my opinion, is a scary proposition. That allows for some real shenanigans — and that isn’t what a free society is based on.”

The consolidation mirrors a national trend, as such deals have ramped up over the past decade. About 40% of all local news-producing television stations in the U.S. are under the control of three large broadcast companies, Nexstar being one of them, according to a 2024 study led by a Stanford University researcher.

Three years ago, Nexstar, which already owned the local Fox affiliate, bought KUSI, long a San Diego staple, for $35 million. In the time since, the two TV newsrooms began sharing local content, with reporters’ stories appearing on both stations. However, the newscasts themselves were different and had different anchors. The stations also provided different non-news programming.

Mike McKinnon, who sold KUSI to Nexstar in 2023, told the Union-Tribune at that time he believed it was likely KUSI would become a CW affiliate.

In a news release announcing the new acquisition Thursday, Sook, Nexstar’s CEO, said in a statement that the transition was “essential to sustaining strong local journalism in the communities we serve.”

“By bringing these two outstanding companies together, Nexstar will be a stronger, more dynamic enterprise — better positioned to deliver exceptional journalism and local programming with enhanced assets, capabilities, and talent,” he said.

He also said the company was “grateful” to President Donald Trump, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr and the DOJ “for recognizing the dynamic forces shaping the media landscape and enabling this transaction to move forward.”

The Washington Post reported that the FCC waived a cap that barred station owners from expanding to reach more than 39% of American households.

The day before the deal was approved, eight states, including California, filed a federal lawsuit seeking to block it.

“This merger would cause incredibly high levels of concentration in local TV markets and is expected to raise cable and satellite prices across the country, causing irreparable harm to local news and consumers who rely on their reporting as a critical source of information,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a statement late Wednesday.

Bonta’s office noted in a news release that the combined entity would own half of the “Big Four” (FOX, NBC, ABC and CBS) network-affiliated stations in the state, including the local FOX and ABC stations in the Sacramento area and the local FOX and CBS stations in the San Diego area.

Author: Source

2 thoughts on “One Company Owns San Diego’s CBS, KUSI, Fox and CW Affiliates

  1. With the Paramount merger with Warner Discovery now 5 corporate behemoths control 96% of the global media further consolidating from just 6 corporate conglomerates 2 short years ago. This includes everything! From commercial networks, cable networks, local networks national newsrooms, local newsrooms, all the newspapers, periodicals, book publishers, radio, satellite radio, and internet service providers. In 1983 there were 58 media companies/corporations. This is how we got here.

    1. This all ensues from the Telecommunications Act of 1996, partially written by Rupert Murdoch (Section 202(h)) and signed into law by Bill Clinton.

      “Seven years after Section 202(h) became law, an intrepid reporter,
      named Alicia Mundy, ultimately discovered the story of Section 202(h)’s
      birth. She found that Section 202(h) was “carefully crafted language”
      developed in secret by 4two in-house lobbyists then employed by Rupert
      Murdoch’s News Corp.

      “Mundy reported that the two lobbyists, Peggy Binzel and Preston
      Padden, recognized that Congress was ultimately unlikely to make
      significant changes to the national ownership cap, which limited how many
      TV stations one company could own. Thus, as Ms. Mundy states:

      “That’s when Binzel and Padden and others devised a plan to keep the
      cap in play after the bill, in whatever form, passed …. If the networks
      and deregulators in the Senate, such as [Senator John] McCain,
      couldn’t get legislation to remove the cap, they could punt it to the
      FCC. It meant that the FCC would have to eliminate or justify the cap,
      and this presented companies with an opportunity to use the FCC’s
      innate lethargy… against itself ….

      “Several veteran Republicans and Democrats who signed on to that
      original bill are now busy denouncing its consequences, acting as
      though provision 202h had been dropped on their doorstep by some
      wayward stork. Although these senators would like to distance
      themselves from 202h, it is actually their very own love child.”

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996#Early_criticism
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telecommunications_Act_of_1996#Later_criticism

      This link is to 2006 article in Federal Communications Law Journal. An excerpt follows:

      https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1453&context=fclj

Leave a Reply to Mateo Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *