Vote Next Month in Your Community Planning Group Election

By Kate Callen

Are you happy with the way San Diego is governed? Do you think our elected officials listen attentively to you and care about your neighborhood?

If your answer is “F*** No!,” you should participate in a 60-year-old system of local democracy where your vote has real impact: Cast your ballots in next month’s Community Planning Group (CPG) elections.

Every March, San Diego’s 41 active CPGs hold elections for open board seats. Unlike elections at higher levels of government, these don’t involve negative campaigning and Big Money mailers. Candidates present their backgrounds and positions, and almost all ballots are cast in person.

It’s a miracle San Diego still has CPGs. The all-volunteer advisory boards, established in 1976 to give citizens a voice in urban planning, came under attack in 2018 for being anti-progress, anti-inclusivity, undemocratic, unscrupulous, and just too darn old.

YIMBY Democrats and the building industry led the charge. The Chamber of Commerce and the County Grand Jury jumped in. CPGs never had the power to block land use proposals, but they were portrayed as marauders who kill off all growth.

Things got nasty. Gary London of London Moeder said. “We need to ‘declaw’ the community groups … mostly composed of white and gray hairs that don’t have a future.” Lynn LaChapelle of Jones Lang LaSalle brokerage said, “Don’t let the housewives who walk dogs get control of the planning group.”

The ageism and sexism were bad enough. But dissing dog lovers was really beyond the pale.

Through it all, the CPGs endured. Even the Uptown Planning Group, singled out for an organizational mauling, continues to hear neighborhood concerns and convey those to city government.

Like my mother before me, I served on the North Park Planning Committee, and the experience taught me the awesome power of citizen determination. CPGs were considered a threat to the status quo simply because they empowered residents and small business owners to speak up and join forces.

Not many people know this, but if you have any kind of problem with the city, your CPG can help. You can attend your monthly CPG meeting, either in person or virtually, and make a statement during non-agenda public comment. Then your complaint is on the record. Your CPG board members will follow up. And representatives of elected officials in the audience will have heard you and will need to respond.

Perhaps most importantly, CPG meetings are an early warning system about projects coming down the pike. I will always regret that I missed a 2019 North Park Planning meeting where a half-baked proposal for bike lanes on 30th Street was a discussion item on the agenda.

At a time when San Diegans are in revolt about autocracy at City Hall, CPGs are uniquely positioned to ensure that citizens get a “Seat at the Table.” That’s the title of a formal proposal by the citywide Community Planners Committee (CPC). It addresses the inequality of Council meetings where project applicants get lots of time to present but community members get scarce time to speak.

“‘Seat at the Table’ seeks to remedy this imbalance by creating a structured opportunity for CPGs and CPC to present their recommendations directly to decision-makers,” CPC Chair Victoria LaBruzzo wrote in a February 23 Rag post.

“It is a modest, targeted reform that aligns with the Legislature’s intent to strengthen public participation and improve the quality of public meetings.”

“Seat at the Table” would also give CPG presenters the same benefit builders and staff have to engage Councilmembers directly.

“How many times have you witnessed City Council inquire of City staff or the project applicant during deliberations on an action item?” said CPC Vice Chair Felicity Senoski in a recent interview.

“We are looking for that same opportunity: the chance to answer questions and provide further clarification during the presentation. This type of engagement is at the heart of the deliberative process.”

Now more than ever, CPGs need strong public support. And it doesn’t cost a dime. You only have study a roster of candidates, show ID at the polling place, and cast your vote. If voter turnout in the March CPG elections is robust, City Hall will take notice.

A list of all CPGs is posted here . Some CPGs have websites that will provide information about when and where your community’s election is. If yours doesn’t have a website, email the contact listed.

Folks, we’ve tried everything else to make our voices heard at City Hall: protests, letters, emails, testimonies, Rag rants. Let’s support this stronghold of local democracy by voting next month in CPG elections.

Editor’s note: Throughout March, the Rag will publish information about CPG elections around the city.

 

 

 

 

Author: Kate Callen

5 thoughts on “Vote Next Month in Your Community Planning Group Election

  1. Last I saw, this Mayor and Council either ignores the Community Planning Group conclusions, or creates a rival CPG which, once staffed by his lackeys, is officially recognized as The Real CPG of record. There was a time when your Council rep would advocate for CPG recommendations. That ship has sailed. Look at the support for the “affordable housing” in the open space canyon off Nimitz. The Point Loma Fault, one of the most significant faults, considered Active and of moderate to high danger. The City handed our open space to the Housing Commission who then showed up with plans that appear to be built right atop the fault. Recent fault research shows perpendicular fracturing is common, and it actually led me to ask a Senior Structural at Development Services if there was a different and lower seismic “Standard of Care” for the Poor. The Community Planning Group came out against this project as well. The argument that this area had been used by BMX kids since 2017 ignores that Marty Smith learned to ride dirt bikes (MX) in this canyon circa 1970. He became the first American to win the United States Grand Prix (motocross) in 1975, two years before Mario Andretti accomplished the same feat in the F1 Grand Prix at Long Beach. Will any of that history matter to this Mayor & Council? Of course it won’t. Keep fighting the good fight but until we purge our City of this Mayor & Council, as the Borg say… “Resistance is Futile”.

  2. Sadly the Point Loma Fault near Nimitz Boulevard is only considered “Potentially Active. Its activity is unknown because it has never been studied by the City of San Diego or the State Geologist.

    https://www.sandiego.gov/sites/default/files/geo20.pdf

    The area is also outside an official Alquist-Priolo (A-P) Earthquake Fault Zone or the Downtown Special Studies Zone that required fault investigations before permits are approved. Therefore, sadly fault investigations are not required by law for the Point Loma Fault.

    When the A-P Maps for the Point Loma Quadrangle were updated in 2021, I asked the State of California to investigate the activity of the Point Loma Fault. Especially due to the many water main failures and bumps on the road near the intersection of Nimitz and Rosecrans in the last 20 years.

    Instead the California Geological Survey just ignored my request to study if the Point Loma Fault was active, and did nothing.

    1. Interesting. The map that used to list The Point Loma Fault and Rose Canyon Fault as moderate to high risk, is nowhere to be found, although Google can still refer to that status. That such a fault is bisecting a residential multi family development is certainly of concern. Do you have the current status as to… “Seismic Activity: The California Department of Conservation (https://www.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/Documents/Publications/FER/FER_265_Point_Loma_La_Jolla_a11y.pdf) recently moved to include more areas of Point Loma and La Jolla into Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones (APEFZs), which are designated areas of high surface rupture hazard.”

  3. Thanks, Kate! I am sharing this excellent article to my email list of friends and neighbors, encouraging them to vote in the Uptown Planners election. (If you live in Bankers Hill, Hillcrest, Medical Complex, Middletown, or University Heights west, it’s not too late: In person voting will be held F, 2/28 & M 3/2. Details here: https://www.uptowncommunityplanning.org/elections )

    And to the skeptics: I hear you. The current city administration’s attitude towards CPGs can be discouraging, frustrating, disappointing, even enraging. BUT, the tide may be turning, especially when new Councilmembers are elected and thanks to the advocacy of the Community Planning Committee that represents all of the CPGs citywide. CPGs are the best forum we currently have to be heard and to have our voices influence city decision makers. Giving up will get us nowhere.

    So, I’m with Kate–Let’s vote & show up to keep our CPGs strong!

Leave a Reply to Louise Rehling Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *