Council Committee Approves Reauthorization of License Plate Readers for San Diego Police

By Shelby Bremer / 7SanDiego / November 12, 2025

San Diego’s Public Safety Committee voted Wednesday in favor of reauthorizing several technologies used by police, including automated license plate readers (ALPRs), sending the matter to the full City Council for a vote.

After more than two hours of public comment and debate, the committee voted 4-0 in favor of reauthorization of 54 technologies. The ALPRs garnered the most public comment both in favor and opposed, over privacy concerns, particularly about data sharing with other agencies. Several of the committee members’ questions and comment focused on prohibited access by federal agencies, with concerns about immigration enforcement and possible federal overreach top of mind.

Beginning in late 2023, San Diego installed about 500 ALPRs, which take about 3 million pictures of cars every month. Those photos are then turned into a searchable database that police say is a “force multiplier,” helping them to find suspects more easily in their investigations.

“For example, if you have a vague suspect description of a vehicle, this system will actually pinpoint us to the exact car that we’re looking for, so we don’t have to stop a bunch of other people, which lets our resources kind of go directly where they need to go,” said Lt. Kristopher McAndrew, who oversees the San Diego Police Department’s ALPR system.

In the hearing, he said police solved four homicides that they would not have been able to solve without the use of the ALPR technology.

But privacy advocates say the ALPR company has had documented issues of improper data sharing with other agencies, in San Diego and across the country, citing examples of police in Texas trying to track a woman they said self-administered an abortion, or multiple agencies in Illinois ending their contracts with the company after learning they were cooperating with federal immigration officials in violation of state law.

“While we’re all just driving around, living out our normal lives, thinking that everything’s fine, the fact of the matter is this data that goes into this system needs to be under our control, and it has not been under our control,” said Seth Hall of the TRUST SD Coalition.

San Diego police said there was initially a three-week period where the vendor “failed to shut off a switch and that opened up access” to other California agencies, which is permitted under state law, though not part of the city’s agreement with the company. But SDPD said they have since rectified that issue, and while other agencies in the state can request the data, San Diego police officers are the only ones who can access it.

SDPD presented its 2024 annual report to the committee on Wednesday ahead of the vote, including changes the agency has made based on recommendations from the city’s Privacy Advisory Board.

Those recommendations centered on the department’s rules for ALPR use as well as how that use is documented, the board’s chair said. Part of that effort includes weekly audits of the system posted publicly online.

“It’s really important because it makes sure that everybody along the chain, from where the data is stored, all the way up through to a police officer collecting that information, knows exactly what their role is to make sure the data is kept safe,” chair Tim Blood said.

The vote Wednesday advances the reauthorization to the full City Council for a vote in December. The technologies are reviewed each year to identify any issues.

Author: Source

6 thoughts on “Council Committee Approves Reauthorization of License Plate Readers for San Diego Police

  1. People might want to read this on the real use of Flock Cameras, and how when people file a FOIA suit to see what they are taking continuous pictures of and win, the cities claim that would be a ‘privacy violation’ and TURN THEM OFF.

    Cities Shut Off Flock Cameras After Court Loss
    https://www.youtube.com/live/1vQn4MWBln0
    __
    sealintheSelkirks

  2. Thanks for posting this. As someone working on this issue I think folks here should be aware that the narrative appearing across media in San Diego is the narrative created by the city, and it is trying to distract from the facts that are in plain sight. Head over to Google News and search Flock ALPR for yourself and just read the headlines. San Diego is on a collision course with all of that trouble. Read the city’s Privacy Advisory Board recommendation for yourself and see that they advised the city to “cease” use of this technology. The Democratic party in CA and here in SD have both voted that this technology should not be used. The local Labor Council opposes it. The ACLU is completely against it. I could go on and on, but you’re not hearing about any of this.

  3. I wouldn’t necessarily be against the cameras if it wasn’t for the lack of oversight, transparency, cost/bendfit analysis (or lack thereof) and my aquired distrust of city and county, and current federal policing policies. Well, the policies might not sound so bad but the implementation has been disgusting and I have zero faith in any of the involved participants.

  4. Remember these when ‘officials’ claim computers are never wrong:

    Denver held a City Council/public meeting on the use of Flock cameras:

    John McKinney’s speech on Flock ends by calling the Mayor a pussy
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95zqRm8vrKk
    __
    Cop who wrongly accused woman caught on video (FLOCK cameras) — now we learn he was fired before
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lpqoqKD0Cdo
    __
    AI gets 100% Match!
    Over 1000 WRONG AI Facial Recognition matches the last couple years…

    Casino’s AI Security Lands Innocent Man Behind Bars, Police Assume ID Is Fake
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j0fYXCFGmOU
    __
    Nest Thermostats upload 50 megabytes of data to Google every day after being disabled – WTF!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jC5wcJM8iuU
    __
    sealintheSelkirks

  5. This is who is using these spy cams, and the kind of weapon Flock is being used as. I honestly can’t really say I’m even a teensy bit surprised. Is anybody here shocked? No?

    Local Police Aid ICE by Tapping School Cameras Amid Trump’s Immigration Crackdown
    Mark Keierleber / Guardian UK
    https://www.rsn.org/001/local-police-aid-ice-by-tapping-school-cameras-amid-trumps-immigration-crackdown.html
    __
    This is how the militarized police surveillance state works. We have so many examples and yet our dear leader politicians refuse to acknowledge the possibility of this kind of mis-use. But then whose side are they actually on anyway, eh? Have to be pretty dang dense to not see this coming!

    sealintheSelkirks

Leave a Reply to Michael Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *