Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas writes one of the meanest decisions ever.

by on April 6, 2011 · 4 comments

in Civil Rights, Life Events

By Dahlia Lithwick / Slate / Originally published  April 1, 2011

In 1985, John Thompson was convicted of murder in Louisiana.  Having already been convicted in a separate armed robbery case, he opted not to testify on his own behalf in his murder trial. He was sentenced to death and spent 18 years in prison—14 of them isolated on death row—and watched as seven executions were planned for him. Several weeks before an execution scheduled for May 1999, Thompson’s private investigators learned that prosecutors had failed to turn over evidence that would have cleared him at his robbery trial. This evidence included the fact that the main informant against him had received a reward from the victim’s family, that the eyewitness identification done at the time described someone who looked nothing like him, and that a blood sample taken from the crime scene did not match Thompson’s blood type.

In 1963, in Brady v. Maryland, the Supreme Court held that prosecutors must turn over to the defense any evidence that would tend to prove a defendant’s innocence. Failure to do so is a violation of the defendant’s constitutional rights. Yet the four prosecutors in Thompson’s case managed to keep secret the fact that they had hidden exculpatory evidence for 20 years. Were it not for Thompson’s investigators, he would have been executed for a murder he did not commit.

Both of Thompson’s convictions were overturned. When he was retried on the murder charges, a jury acquitted him after 35 minutes. He sued the former Louisiana district attorney for Orleans Parish, Harry Connick Sr. (yes, his dad) for failing to train his prosecutors about their legal obligation to turn over exculpatory evidence to the defense. A jury awarded Thompson $14 million for this civil rights violation, one for every year he spent wrongfully incarcerated. The district court judge added another $1 million in attorneys’ fees. A panel of the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the verdict. An equally divided 5th Circuit, sitting en banc, affirmed again.

For the remainder of this article, please go here.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

nunya April 6, 2011 at 12:56 pm

I don’t think it’s possible for me to be any more disdainful or scornful of the Robert’s Supreme Court.


Peyton Farquhar April 6, 2011 at 6:14 pm

What else would you *possibly* expect from KKK wannabes Clarence “pubic hair” Thomas & Scalia? Scalia is simply a douche and Thomas thinks he’s Caucasian.


Rick Ward aka mr.rick April 6, 2011 at 9:21 pm

This is just your friendly, neighborhood Republican party.This is just part of the same campaign that is being pushed all around the U.S. The crooks know they can pretty much do whatever strikes thier fancy. These most recent bad, for the crooks, elections will cause them to redouble their efforts.I surely would hate to have to be the one who’s job it would be to counter whatever move their dirty tricks team comes up with.


blade December 5, 2013 at 10:42 am



Leave a Comment

Older Article:

Newer Article: