1 thought on “What’s Next for the Pacific Beach ‘Pencil Tower’?”
In the Letter from the State regarding a High-Rise Tower (THANK YOU!), ignoring the voted 30-ft coastal height limit, the letter states: “The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) received a request for technical assistance regarding the application of the State Density Bonus Law (SDBL)1 to the development project proposed at 970 Turquoise Street (Project).” Has anybody seen the “request for technical assistance?” It would be interesting to see what else the City provided in it. The State offers no date or format. I’m just wondering what the City said in addition to the answered questions.
Gary Cristofani on Letters: “Todd has been clueless since returning from his insular Sacramento bubble. Any expressed opposition to any of his ideas were…” Nov 11, 15:26
Jay Coffman on A Retraction on ‘No on Gloria Recall’: “Thank you Kate – I find that when anyone continues to examine an issue and is willing to modify their…” Nov 11, 14:40
Daniel Beeman on A Retraction on ‘No on Gloria Recall’: “In 1998 WE, North Park LLMD (M.A.D.s now) put up 1st, and maybe only, Solar Streetlight program in SoCal! We…” Nov 11, 12:44
In the Letter from the State regarding a High-Rise Tower (THANK YOU!), ignoring the voted 30-ft coastal height limit, the letter states: “The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) received a request for technical assistance regarding the application of the State Density Bonus Law (SDBL)1 to the development project proposed at 970 Turquoise Street (Project).” Has anybody seen the “request for technical assistance?” It would be interesting to see what else the City provided in it. The State offers no date or format. I’m just wondering what the City said in addition to the answered questions.