FBI, Homeland Security and Local Police Coordinated the Crackdown of the Occupy Movement with Big Banks

by on December 30, 2012 · 3 comments

in American Empire, Civil Disobedience, Civil Rights, Economy, History, Organizing

San Diego Police rampage against peaceful Occupy demonstrators. Photo by David Hatfield.

New documents prove what was once dismissed as paranoid fantasy:
totally integrated corporate-state repression of dissent

It was more sophisticated than we had imagined: new documents show that the violent crackdown on Occupy last fall – so mystifying at the time – was not just coordinated at the level of the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and local police.

The crackdown, which involved, as you may recall, violent arrests, group disruption, canister missiles to the skulls of protesters, people held in handcuffs so tight they were injured, people held in bondage till they were forced to wet or soil themselves -was coordinated with the big banks themselves.

The Partnership for Civil Justice Fund, in a groundbreaking scoop that should once more shame major US media outlets (why are nonprofits now some of the only entities in America left breaking major civil liberties news?), filed this request. The document – reproduced here in an easily searchable format – shows a terrifying network of coordinated DHS, FBI, police, regional fusion center, and private-sector activity so completely merged into one another that the monstrous whole is, in fact, one entity: in some cases, bearing a single name, the Domestic Security Alliance Council. And it reveals this merged entity to have one centrally planned, locally executed mission. The documents, in short, show the cops and DHS working for and with banks to target, arrest, and politically disable peaceful American citizens.

The documents, released after long delay in the week between Christmas and New Year, show a nationwide meta-plot unfolding in city after city in an Orwellian world:

  • six American universities are sites where campus police funneled information about students involved with OWS to the FBI, with the administrations’ knowledge (p51);
  • banks sat down with FBI officials to pool information about OWS protesters harvested by private security;
  • plans to crush Occupy events, planned for a month down the road, were made by the FBI – and offered to the representatives of the same organizations that the protests would target; and even threats of the assassination of OWS leaders by sniper fire – by whom? Where? – now remain redacted and undisclosed to those American citizens in danger, contrary to standard FBI practice to inform the person concerned when there is a threat against a political leader (p61).

As Mara Verheyden-Hilliard, executive director of the PCJF, put it, the documents show that from the start, the FBI – though it acknowledges Occupy movement as being, in fact, a peaceful organization – nonetheless designated OWS repeatedly as a “terrorist threat”:

“FBI documents just obtained by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund (PCJF) … reveal that from its inception, the FBI treated the Occupy movement as a potential criminal and terrorist threat … The PCJF has obtained heavily redacted documents showing that FBI offices and agents around the country were in high gear conducting surveillance against the movement even as early as August 2011, a month prior to the establishment of the OWS encampment in Zuccotti Park and other Occupy actions around the country.”

Verheyden-Hilliard points out the close partnering of banks, the New York Stock Exchange and at least one local Federal Reserve with the FBI and DHS, and calls it “police-statism”:

“This production [of documents], which we believe is just the tip of the iceberg, is a window into the nationwide scope of the FBI’s surveillance, monitoring, and reporting on peaceful protestors organizing with the Occupy movement … These documents also show these federal agencies functioning as a de facto intelligence arm of Wall Street and Corporate America.”

The documents show stunning range:

  • in Denver, Colorado, that branch of the FBI and a “Bank Fraud Working Group” met in November 2011 – during the Occupy protests – to surveil the group.
  • The Federal Reserve of Richmond, Virginia had its own private security surveilling Occupy Tampa and Tampa Veterans for Peace and passing privately-collected information on activists back to the Richmond FBI, which, in turn, categorized OWS activities under its “domestic terrorism” unit.
  • The Anchorage, Alaska “terrorism task force” was watching Occupy Anchorage.
  • The Jackson, Michigan “joint terrorism task force” was issuing a “counterterrorism preparedness alert” about the ill-organized grandmas and college sophomores in Occupy there.
  • Also in Jackson, Michigan, the FBI and the “Bank Security Group” – multiple private banks – met to discuss the reaction to “National Bad Bank Sit-in Day” (the response was violent, as you may recall).
  • The Virginia FBI sent that state’s Occupy members’ details to the Virginia terrorism fusion center.
  • The Memphis FBI tracked OWS under its “joint terrorism task force” aegis, too. And so on, for over 100 pages.

Jason Leopold, at Truthout.org, who has sought similar documents for more than a year, reported that the FBI falsely asserted in response to his own FOIA requests that no documents related to its infiltration of Occupy Wall Street existed at all. But the release may be strategic: if you are an Occupy activist and see how your information is being sent to terrorism task forces and fusion centers, not to mention the “longterm plans” of some redacted group to shoot you, this document is quite the deterrent.

There is a new twist: the merger of the private sector, DHS and the FBI means that any of us can become WikiLeaks, a point that Julian Assange was trying to make in explaining the argument behind his recent book. The fusion of the tracking of money and the suppression of dissent means that a huge area of vulnerability in civil society – people’s income streams and financial records – is now firmly in the hands of the banks, which are, in turn, now in the business of tracking your dissent.

Remember that only 10% of the money donated to WikiLeaks can be processed – because of financial sector and DHS-sponsored targeting of PayPal data. With this merger, that crushing of one’s personal or business financial freedom can happen to any of us. How messy, criminalizing and prosecuting dissent. How simple, by contrast, just to label an entity a “terrorist organization” and choke off, disrupt or indict its sources of financing.

Why the huge push for counterterrorism “fusion centers”, the DHS militarizing of police departments, and so on? It was never really about “the terrorists”. It was not even about civil unrest. It was always about this moment, when vast crimes might be uncovered by citizens – it was always, that is to say, meant to be about you.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar obecean January 1, 2013 at 5:50 pm

Fascism.

Reply

avatar Frank Gormlie January 2, 2013 at 9:15 am

I don’t think we have fascism but we certainly have trends in that direction.

Reply

avatar John January 3, 2013 at 5:57 am

While I agree with this underlying premise:

” It was never really about “the terrorists”. It was not even about civil unrest. It was always about this moment, when vast crimes might be uncovered by citizens – it was always, that is to say, meant to be about you.”

At least regarding the exploitation of 9/11 in permeating all levels of our privacy and rights, however I’m not so sure the conspiracy theory tone of all of this is justified.

I haven’t reviewed these documents but for instance:

“The Federal Reserve of Richmond, Virginia had its own private security surveilling Occupy Tampa and Tampa Veterans for Peace and passing privately-collected information on activists back to the Richmond FBI, which, in turn, categorized OWS activities under its “domestic terrorism” unit.””

At various points of this there was a lot of inflammatory talk about what institutions would be in the crosshairs of the movement. And the media was broadcasting real events like in Oakland with OWS storming city hall and rioting across the city.

Lacking any central leadership it was a free for all on the internet with all the anger motivated plans and threats going on.

In short, I don’t think we would have to look too hard across the internet before we could find someone talking- albeit without official OWS spokesperson authority (because there wasn’t any) about burning some of these banks to the ground, maybe with its occupants in it.

If you were in their position what would you do? We could even argue that widespread acts of terrorism tearing down these institutions was exactly what some of OWS participants wanted- and said so.

That’s not what the majority of the 99% wanted.

Applaud the efforts to draw all of this out into the light, I really do. I just get a different take on it, and all these alliances are hardly secret or illegal. They do suck I’ll give you that.

You’ll have better luck leaning on your Congressman to end Infraguard and the Terrorism Liason Officer payments to citizen snitches for progress than you will inciting conspiracy theories.

Finally read some of the works of G. Wm. Domhoff, and let it sink in. I used to go for this “N.W.O.” nonsense but realized over time they are in fact a fantasy of the paranoid.

A good place to start:

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/

(I may have posted this before, but at least for a fun read if you didn’t know about this, read about Bohemian Grove-

http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/power/bohemian_grove.html

fascinating stuff, years ago I lived about 20 miles away and had no idea)

Oh, most of what is believed the NWO is doing and who they are has sound basis to introduce into a discussion. However the bankers aren’t in some secret agreement with the alphabet agencies to oppress us or silence OWS. These people usually have psychopathic personality traits, which also precludes getting together in a group of like minded nuts agreeing on a mutually beneficial agenda. Imagine a dozen Napoleans in one room.
Besides they wouldn’t have to, as events unfolded we saw that some members of OWS were perfectly capable of marginalizing the whole movement perfectly well by themselves. You only need some of the Oakland film reels to prove this to anyone but a complete anarchist.

Reply

Leave a Comment


9 + = 13

Older Article:

Newer Article: