San Diego Activists Slam Both Susan Davis and Duncan Hunter for Supporting the NDAA

by on February 5, 2012 · 9 comments

in Civil Rights, Military, San Diego

Anti-NDAA protesters at Cong. Duncan Hunter's office, Feb 3, 2012. Photo by Hugh Moore.

Another Action Planned During State Democratic Party on February 11th

Activists from around San Diego County demonstrated on Friday, February 3rd, against both Democrat Susan Davis and Republican Duncan Hunter for their support of the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 – the bill signed into law by President Obama on the last day of 2011.

Demonstrators gather in front of Cong. Susan Davis' office on Adams Ave. Photo by Marcia Patt.

The Act allows the government to arrest and indefinitely detain American citizens without charges or trials. Demonstrators staged simultaneous protests outside the offices of Davis and Hunter, both San Diego County legislators in the House of Representatives, who voted for the original bill.

On Adams Avenue, where Davis has her San Diego office, nearly 40 people rallied, waved signs – calling on Davis to either “repeal the NDAA or resign!”  And in the El Cajon industrial park where Hunter has his office, another two dozen demonstrators called on Hunter to resign or get rid of the NDAA.

Several members of one of San Diego County tea party factions joined progressives at Hunter’s office site.  This reflects the fact that both sides of the political spectrum oppose the NDAA.

Protesters across the street from Davis office. Photo by Frank Gormlie.

The action at Davis’ office was organized by a recently-formed coalition called Save the Bill of Rights. It consists of members of different progressive organizations, such as MoveOn San Diego, Occupy San Diego, the Movement for a Democratic Society, the Democratic Party, and Progressives for a Democratic America. None of those groups have actually endorsed the new coalition, we are told.

It has a website:  Their website is up and running but is still accepting text and links from the group’s members.

The Ramona Forum – made up of progressives, independents and tea party members from that East County community – sponsored the action at Hunter’s office.

At the Adams Avenue protest in front of Susan Davis’ office, had gathered at 1pm, and after about a half hour, they gathered at the building’s front steps for a rally.

Frank Gormlie, an organizer of MoveOn and Save the Bill of Rights (and editor of this website), welcomed people to the gathering, giving some background to the passage of the NDAA and its effects. Anita Wucinic-Turner read a sample resolution that has been taken to other city councils around the country condemning the NDAA.

Organizer Bob Dorn gives some historical background of repression.

Bob Dorn then presented some historical background of government efforts over the centuries in curtailing freedoms in this country.  Both Anita and Bob are also members of the Save the Bill of Rights group.

Dave Patterson, a key organizer for the Ramona Forum, was one of the main speakers at the Hunter office action.  A local, Christian conservative businessman, Eric Anderson, also gave a few words.

Anita Wucinci-Turner and Frank Gormlie on steps in front of Davis' office. Photo by Marcia Patt.

Another protest against the NDAA is planned for the State Democratic Party convention being held in San Diego next weekend. The Save the Bill of Rights coalition and its supporters are calling for a march and rally during the convention to bring attention to the role that the Democratic Party has had in passing this Act.  The group plans to rally at Children’s Park at First and Island at noon on Saturday, February 11th, and then marching to a site across the street from the Convention Center for a rally with speakers.

Even though the NDAA’s chief sponsors and proponents were US Senate Republicans, most Democratic Senators also voted for it when the Senate version came before them.  Only 13 Senators voted against the bill, including Senators Al Franken, Bernie Sanders, and Rand Paul.

However, it was a different story in the House of Representatives when that body voted for its version of the bill.  House Democrats were exactly split on it – as 43 voted for it and 43 voted against it.  Those voting for the NDAA included just about the entire San Diego County delegation, including Darrel Issa, Brian Bilbray, Susan Davis, and Duncan Hunter.  Bob Filner – still a member of Congress while he runs for San Diego mayor – was not in DC during the vote, and did not vote. (We assume he was in San Diego campaigning …)

February 3rd was a national day of action against the NDAA and there were protests at various Congressional offices around the country. In a sign that the push-back against this Act is gaining momentum, several bills have been introduced in both houses to either counter the worst provisions or remove the provisions that apply to American citizens.

In fact, staff at Susan Davis’ office, approached the demonstrators gathered outside their office and handed out fliers that claimed that Davis had worked to lessen the worst language in the NDAA and had even co-authored a new bill to counter the worst of the original Act.  Yet, the language that Davis claims she had inserted into the bill only had to do with exempting American citizens from “military custody” and was silent on civilian custody, such as of the FBI, Homeland Security, or even local police departments. And in an example of ‘thou doth protest too much’, Davis’ assertion that she is helping to sponsor a new bill that that will work to undercut the worst of the old bill – speaks for itself. If the old bill – the one that passed – was okay – as she claims, why did Davis then feel compelled to have to sponsor a new “improved” bill?

Activists gather in the sun in front of Davis' office. Photo by Marcia Patt.

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar Jerry Malamud February 5, 2012 at 2:25 pm

Good article!


avatar Deb Stone February 5, 2012 at 2:49 pm

What excellent coverage and great photos too.
The persistent and relentless demands and protests
will not sweep this unconstitutional legislation under the proverbial
rug! Susan Davis has some splainin” to do!


avatar Freedom fighter February 5, 2012 at 4:06 pm

Voting will do nothing. Put a hold on all votes and make Washington resign. That will work long enough to change the way things work. Without a government to manipulate, the banks will have nothing.


avatar Dave Patterson February 5, 2012 at 5:20 pm

The Conservative that spoke against NDAA was Eric Andersen.


avatar Frank Gormlie February 6, 2012 at 9:23 am

Dave – thanks, I added his name to the text.


avatar Pat Gracian February 5, 2012 at 11:22 pm

Thanks for the excellent coverage!
You are there when main-stream corporate media continues to fail to inform the public about issues that matter.
Good work!


avatar David Secor February 6, 2012 at 9:16 am

(In full disclosure, I am the Democratic candidate opposing Duncan Hunter in House District 50. Website:
Mr. Hunter is the Keeper of the Flame for the people of District 50, and in voting to allow any of his own constituents, and potentially himself, to be “disappeared” by the military solely on “suspicious” activity noticed by “someone” in violation of at least 3 Amendments to our Bill of Rights -4th, 5th and 6th – is a clear violation of his sworn oath to defend the Constitution against enemies both foreign AND DOMESTIC.
Ron Paul, on the right, and Bernie Sanders, on the left, had no difficulty seeing that the language in question in the NDAA was un-Constitutional, but Mr. Hunter, who wraps himself in God, the Flag and the Constitution when it suits him, not only voted for this language, but even worse, was on the committee that reviewed the language of the bill! He “looked hard at this,” and found no problem with the language!
I know ours is a Republican-leaning district, baut if you ccan vote for a man who would be quite comfortable having YOU “disappeared” based on “suspicious activity” noticed by “someone,” then you should stop demanding Constitutional protections on other issues, because, with eyes wide open, YOU VOTED FOR THE MAN who would deny YOU THOSE PROTECTIONS!
You don’t have to vote Dem if you are so sick you can’t. There is a Libertarian candidate and a Tea Party candidate on the ballot, and both would do a far better job in representing our district, and defending the Constitution, than Mr. Hunter, who may “look hard,” but simply cannot see. He is an embarrassment to us all.


avatar unWASHEdwalmaRtthONG February 6, 2012 at 12:42 pm

And so was his father.


avatar Rita Marie Wagner February 6, 2012 at 4:10 pm

I’m proud when Americans ignore their politcal affiliations and do what is right for the country. We are seeing more and more, that left wing and right wing don’t mean much when there are evil people in power.


Leave a Comment

Before clicking Submit, please complete this simple statement to help us weed out the bots... Thank you! *

Older Article:

Newer Article: