Palm Oil – Worst Food Additive Ever. It’s in Half of All Foods We Eat and Its Production Destroys Rainforests

by on November 7, 2011 · 6 comments

in Health, Labor

by Jill Richardson / La Vida Locavore / Originally published Oct. 25, 2011

What could be so terrible? Palm oil, of course. I wrote this piece for Alternet (the original has links) and was so scandalized by what I learned while writing it that I’ve decided to cross-post it here.

On August 10, police and security for the massive palm oil corporation Wilmar International (of which Archer Daniels Midland is the second largest shareholder) stormed a small, indigenous village on the Indonesian island of Sumatra. They came with bulldozers and guns, destroying up to 70 homes, evicting 82 families, and arresting 18 people. Then they blockaded the village, keeping the villagers in — and journalists out. (Wilmar claims it has done no wrong.)

The village, Suku Anak Dalam, was home to an indigenous group that observes their own traditional system of land rights on their ancestral land and, thus, lacks official legal titles to the land. This is common among indigenous peoples around the world — so common, in fact, that it is protected by the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Indonesia, for the record, voted in favor of the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples in 2007. Yet the government routinely sells indigenous peoples’ ancestral land to corporations. Often the land sold is Indonesia’s lowland rainforest, a biologically rich area home to endangered species like the orangutan, Asian elephant, Sumatran rhinoceros, Sumatran tiger, and the plant Rafflesia arnoldii, which produces the world’s largest flower.

So why all this destruction? Chances are you’ll find the answer in your pantry. Or your refrigerator, your bathroom, or even under your sink. The palm oil industry is one of the largest drivers of deforestation in Indonesia. Palm oil and palm kernel oil, almost unheard of a decade or two ago, are now unbelievably found in half of all packaged foods in the grocery store (as well as body care and cleaning supplies). These oils, traditional in West Africa, now come overwhelmingly from Indonesia and Malaysia. They cause jawdropping amounts of deforestation (and with it, carbon emissions) and human rights abuses.

“The recipe for palm oil expansion is cheap land, cheap labor, and a corrupt government, and unfortunately Indonesia fits that bill,” says Ashley Schaeffer of Rainforest Action Network.

The African oil palm provides two different oils with different properties: palm oil and palm kernel oil. Palm oil is made from the fruit of the tree, and palm kernel oil comes from the seed, or “nut,” inside the fruit. You can find it on ingredient lists under a number of names, including palmitate, palmate, sodium laureth sulphate, sodium lauryl sulphate, glyceryl stearate, or stearic acid. Palm oil even turns up in so-called “natural,” “healthy,” or even “cruelty-free” products, like Earth Balance (vegan margarine) or Newman-O’s organic Oreo-like cookies. Palm oil is also used in “renewable” biofuels.

A hectare of land (2.47 acres) produces, on average, 3.7 metric tons of palm oil, 0.4 metric tons of palm kernel oil, and 0.6 tons of palm kernel cake. (Palm kernel cake is used as animal feed.) In 2009, Indonesia produced over 20.5 million metric tons, and Malaysia produced over 17.5 million metric tons. As of 2009, the U.S. was only the seventh largest importer of palm oil in the world, but as the second largest importer of palm kernel oil, it ranks third in the world as a driver of deforestation for palm oil plantations.

Indonesia has lost 46 percent of its forests since 1950, and the forests have recently disappeared at a rate of about 1.5 million hectares (an area larger than the state of Connecticut) per year. Of the 103.3 million hectares of remaining forests in 2000, only 88.2 million remained in 2009. At that time, an estimated 7.3 million hectares of oil palm plantations were already established, mostly on the islands of Sumatra and Borneo. Indonesia plans to continue the palm oil expansion, hoping to produce an additional 8.3 million metric tons by 2015 — this means a 71 percent expansion in area devoted to palm oil in the coming years.

At stake are not only endangered species and human lives, but carbon emissions. One of the ecosystems at risk is Indonesia’s peat swamps, where soil contains an astounding 65 percent organic matter. (Most soils contain only two to 10 percent organic matter.) Laurel Sutherlin of Rainforest Action Network describes the draining and often burning of these peat swamps as “a carbon bomb.” Destruction of its peat swamps as well as its rainforests makes Indonesia the world’s third largest carbon emitter after the U.S. and China.

Among the horror stories coming out of Southeast Asian palm oil plantations are accounts of child slave labor. Ferdi and Volario, ages 14 and 21, respectively, were each met by representatives of the Malaysian company Kuala Lampur Kepong in their North Sumatra villages. They were offered high-paying jobs with good working conditions, and they jumped at the opportunity. According to an account by Rainforest Action Network: “The two worked grueling hours each day spraying oil palm trees with toxic chemical fertilizers, without any protection to shield their hands, face or lungs. After work, Ferdi and Volario were forced inside the camp where they’d stay overnight under lock and key, guarded by security. If they had to use the bathroom, they’d do their best to hold it until morning or relieve themselves in plastic bags or shoes.” They escaped after two months and were never paid for their work.

What is the industry doing about such horrific claims? It has established the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO). Kuala Lampur Kepong, Wilmar International, and Archer Daniels Midland are all members, and so are their customers, Cargill, Nestlé and Unilever, as well as environmental groups like the World Wildlife Fund and Conservation International. But, according to Sutherlin, membership in RSPO means nothing — other than that an organization paid its dues. “That’s the first level of greenwash,” says Sutherlin.

RSPO certifies some products and companies, and Sutherlin says that does have some meaning, but leaves major loopholes open. For example, there are no carbon or climate standards, and there have been problems with the implementation of social safeguards. “It’s been a spotty record about their ability to enforce the standards for how people are treated and how communities are affected,” notes Sutherlin. Yet, he says, RSPO is “the best game in town.”

Rather than simply relying on RSPO’s certification, Rainforest Action Network has focused its campaign on the U.S. agribusiness giant Cargill, which has a hand in fully 25 percent of palm oil on the global market. Rainforest Action Network is asking Cargill to sign on to a set of social and environmental safeguards and to provide public transparency on its palm oil operations. If Cargill cleans up its act, perhaps it will help put pressure on other major multinationals like Unilever, Procter & Gamble, and Nestlé, which also source palm oil from unethical suppliers like Wilmar International.

Journalists have also criticized environmental groups for “cozy relationships with corporate eco-nasties.” The World Wildlife Fund has come under attack for its partnership with Wilmar, the corporation that attacked a Sumatran village. Its involvement in RSPO serves as a reminder of the accusations in a 2010 Nation article, which claimed that “many of the green organizations meant to be leading the fight are busy shoveling up hard cash from the world’s worst polluters — and burying science-based environmentalism in return.” (WWF says it received no payment from Wilmar in this particular case.)

The ugly issue of palm oil even touches the beloved American icon, the Girl Scout cookie. When Girl Scouts Madison Vorva and Rhiannon Tomtishen began a project to save the orangutan for their Bronze Awards, they discovered the link between habitat loss and palm oil. Then they looked at a box of Girl Scout cookies and found palm oil on the list of ingredients. The two 11-year-olds — who are now ages 15 and 16 — began a campaign to get the Girl Scouts to remove palm oil from its cookies.

It took five years to get a response from the supposedly wholesome Girl Scouts USA (whose 2012 slogan is “Forever Green”). While the organization ignored its own members for several years, it was unable to ignore the coverage the girls received from Time magazine, the Wall Street Journal, and several major TV networks. Once the story was so well-covered by the media, Girl Scouts USA responded, promising it would try to move to a sustainable source of palm oil by 2015. In the meantime, it would continue buying palm oil that could have come from deforested lands or plantations that use child slave labor, but would also buy GreenPalm certificates, which fund a price premium that goes to producers following RSPO’s best practice guidelines.

So what should consumers do? For the time being, avoiding products containing palm oil is probably your best bet. Since palm oil is so ubiquitous this will likely mean opting to buy fewer processed foods overall. Don’t forget to check your beauty and cleaning products, too. In a handful of cases, such as Dr. Bronner’s soaps, palm oil comes from fair trade, organic sources. But this is hardly the norm, and with the immense amount of palm oil used in the U.S., it’s unlikely that sustainable sources could cover all of the current demand.

Jill Richardson is the founder of the blog La Vida Locavore and a member of the Organic Consumers Association policy advisory board. She is the author of Recipe for America: Why Our Food System Is Broken and What We Can Do to Fix It..

{ 6 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar malcolm migacz November 7, 2011 at 11:30 am



avatar Andy Green November 8, 2011 at 6:41 am

First things first. To switch away from Palm Oil would mean an inc rease in land under cultivation of oil from the size of Spain to the size of Canada…is this sustainable?

With out Palm Oil shelf lives reduce leading to increased food waste…sustainable?

Organic and Fair trade do not mean sustainable, do not be fooled into thinking otherwise.

RSPO is the only organisation that has had the guts to try and take genuine sustainable action to improve the production practices pf palm oil. Do not boycott, instead inisist that retailers stock products with certified palm oil that can be traced to legal and sustainable plantations. This is the only way to save the Orang Utan, Sumatran tiger etc.


avatar john November 8, 2011 at 6:43 am

Missing from the story is what ecological, economic or end cost factors are found in the substitute ingredient to be used in place of palm oil. It’s only half a story without it- did palm oil replace lard?
While I understand the global greenhouse emissions ramifications, I am probably not the only American who is starting to care a hell of a lot less about hearing of sweatshop labor violations overseas or demand we see improvements in the lives of the masses in all third world countries our corporations do business in or feel bad we eat a damn cookie. This agenda is global socialism and half of me feels bad for malaysian children having to poop in their shoe but the other half of me looks out the window up the street and my ex next door neighbor who’s been homeless for 3 years is pooping in his shoe too, and I’m a half a month’s rent from joining him. Really! I don’t care about the Malaysian child labor, I cleaned my house today just to scrounge up $3.63 for a loaf of bread and jam for breakfast the next 5 days. Give this **** a rest, we’ve been hearing it for years and the result was the transformation of China into a capitalist monster that’s destroying the planet. People who push policy agendas with their hearts and the author of this piece is surely one, (not a Ragster so I needn’t worry about offending them) are dangerous and usually naive and even counterproductive to their own cause- note the point I opened with about not discussing the alternative to palm oil. Probably be replaced by something that endangers the Zambian flying butt monkey’s habitat or the like.
I think it’s high time we start looking out for our own at home and stop feeling sorry for the rest of the planet’s poor while we still have a measure of substance above their often willful primitive societies. Hate to say it but many poor countries with uneducated people and corrupt leaders are that way because they are uneducated, poor and corrupt. Deny if you like but the logic is sound.
Palm oil, whatever. Does it put an American or anyone within an hour’s distance pushing a shopping cart near me to work? No? Send me some, I couldn’t afford butter with the jam and bread.


avatar malcolm migacz November 8, 2011 at 11:46 am

they have organic butter on sale at sprouts. $4.99, keep digging. I live on the street and it’s not bad, with the money i save in rent i eat only organic. What’s more important than that. Rent should have never been, occupy San Diego, the rent is free.!


avatar Andy Green November 8, 2011 at 6:43 am

To be a memebr of RSPO you must publish an annual p[orgress report showing how you purchase palm oil….more than Greenwashing.


avatar john November 8, 2011 at 7:08 am

For perspective I followed the link to the alternet original posting and was not surprised to find many comments like this:

“I don’ t know if you ever saw the movie “The Matirx” but in one of those films the bad guys capture the head of the good guys (can’t recall the actors name but he was one of the Mod Squad kids). Anyway they are having this back and back and the bad guy says, “what are you talking about this isn’t YOUR planet, this is a planet rich in resources and you humans are a virus, and just like any virus we have to exterminate you… …aside from the fact that it’s a movie, I often have wondered it that wasn’t a truism. We do seem to destroy everything we touch.”

“Not to worry Krissy, after we biological parasites finally (sooner than later) kill ourselves off, by making our environment unable to support life, the Earth will renew and reclaim. She’ll not be “destroyed”, just a bit ill for a little while in her long life…from a parasitic infection. ”

I want them influencing public policy, sure I do.

(this is why I have the blue koolaid in one hand, and the red koolaid in the other. they both taste alike to me, I only spit out the pink and purplish black stuff when it comes around)


Leave a Comment

Before clicking Submit, please complete this simple statement to help us weed out the bots... Thank you! *

Older Article:

Newer Article: