It’s Up To Us To Stop This Nuclear Madness – NIRS Warns Stay Out of the Rain

by on March 18, 2011 · 5 comments

in Environment

As the first Fukushima radioactive plumes hit the West Coast of North America, “leaders” and “experts” try to reassure us there’s no danger. But it’s become painfully obvious that it’s up to us to determine the real truth, and to take action to stop this nuclear madness.

March 18, San Francisco—The SF Chronicle reported today,

“In a statement in Washington Thursday, President Obama had assuring words after a briefing from experts at several federal agencies: ‘We do not expect harmful levels of radiation to reach the United States, whether it’s the West Coast, Hawaii, Alaska, or US territories in the Pacific,‘ he said.”

The problem is, it’s a well established scientific fact that there is no such thing as non-harmful levels of radiation.

In 2005 the National Academy of Sciences released a study that demonstrated this.

In a June 29, 2005 press release, the Academy stated “A preponderance of scientific evidence shows that even low doses of ionizing radiation…are likely to pose some risk of adverse health effects.”

Richard Monson was chair of the committee that carried out this study. He was a professor of epidemiology at the Harvard School of Public Health. In the press release Monson stated ”The scientific research base shows that there is no threshold of exposure below which low levels of ionizing radiation can be demonstrated to be harmless or beneficial. The health risks—particularly the development of solid cancers in organs—rise proportionally with exposure. At low doses of radiation, the risk of inducing solid cancers is very small. As the overall lifetime exposure increases, so does the risk.”

This last sentence is what’s left out of all the statements of assurance from everyone from Obama to your local health department.

Because the first Fukushima plumes will be followed by others, and no one knows for how long. These multiple exposures will of course increase the risk to our health.

It’s been raining today, and the Chron’s forecast calls for rain through Tuesday. In SoCal, where a plume will likely hit this evening, the forecast is for fog today and rain tomorrow.

Precipitation is known to bring radiation down, making exposure, contamination and risk even worse. Yesterday the Nuclear Information and Resource Center ( provided this advice:

“RAIN: If it rains over the next several days, stay out of it. If you get wet, put your clothes in the wash and take a shower.

Leave outerwear and shoes at the door so you don’t track water in your home.

Do not collect rainwater for drinking or later use during the period of time when active distribution of radiation is happening.”

Looking Back To Go Forward

Back in the late 50s and early 60s, the nuclear arms race was accelerating out of control.
The US and USSR were detonating increasingly larger H-bombs in the atmosphere, culminating with a 100 megaton blast by the latter then Superpower in 1961.

In response to this madness, and out of concern for future generations, Nobel Peace Prize winner Dr. Albert Schweitzer published “The Rights of the Unborn and the Peril Today.”

In his paper Schweitzer spoke out against the “campaign of assurance” that used oblique numbers and bland denials to convince people that radioactive fallout was of little or no danger.

“The arithmetical results of optimists,” Schweitzer wrote, “are, however, not so reliable as they would like us to believe.”

As the magablasts intensified, scientists like fellow Nobel laureate Linus Pauling reported that levels of radioactivity in milk were rising at alarming rates around the world.

And in response people mobilized around the world to “Ban the Bomb.” In the US mothers mobilized and marched calling for such a ban.

In July of 1963, the US and USSR signed an agreement partially banning atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons.

On that occasion President Kennedy said, “The number of children and grandchildren with cancer in their bones, with leukemia in their blood, or with poison in their lungs might seem statistically small to some, in comparison with natural health hazards, but this is not a natural health hazard—and it is not a statistical issue.

“The loss of even one human life, or the malformation of even one baby—who may be born long after we are gone—should be of concern to all of us. Our children and grandchildren are not merely statistics toward which we can be indifferent.”

Today we find ourselves in a similar situation, though this time the source of the fallout descending on us is from all the way across the Pacific. And in the nation that the US dropped atomic bombs on.

Kennedy did not necessarily sign the ban or speak those eloquent long ago words out of the goodness of his heart. More likely it was because people power and the truth it spoke forced his hand.

And now it’s time for us to make that happen again.

No nukes!

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar Jon March 21, 2011 at 10:40 am

What about everything we grow here in California? I personally have a little garden in my OB back yard, and frankly, I’m a bit scared to eat from it now after all of the rain we got last night. Think about the health concerns of vegtables, fruit, milk, beef, and polutry on a national level that CA distrubutes to everyone in the US. Scary stuff. NO NUKES!


avatar Random OB'r March 21, 2011 at 12:59 pm

Your garden’s food will be fine. Here’s a very nice chart showing a comparison between common (and uncommon) radiation exposures.

As to the story, I realize this is an opinion piece, but you might do better than citing facts from such a biased source as the NISR. Hyperbolic fear mongering does no one on either side of this issue any good.

“The problem is, it’s a well established scientific fact that there is no such thing as non-harmful levels of radiation.”

Uhh, human beings are bombarded by radiation every day.


avatar RB March 21, 2011 at 2:18 pm

Great link and chart….thanks.
Unfortunately, too many times people use opinions as if they were facts.
It sure shows a lack of scientific training, IMO.


avatar Sunshine March 21, 2011 at 1:54 pm

“The World’s Largest Evidence-Based Natural Medical Database with 16,048 Articles indexed and growing daily.”


avatar Andrew MCKILLOP February 23, 2012 at 9:14 am

I have an antinuclear book coming out published by Palgrave Macmillan

If you do book reviews maybe you’d like to review it ?


Leave a Comment

Before clicking Submit, please complete this simple statement to help us weed out the bots... Thank you! *

Older Article:

Newer Article: