Obama Administration: Build More Nukes

by on March 16, 2011 · 8 comments

in Energy, Environment, Health

Tuesday Mar 15th, 2011 8:25 PM

As the nuclear disaster in Japan intensifies, US Secretary Steven Chu calls on Congress for $36 billion to build new nuclear plants in the US.

Today at Fukushima’s desperate deteriorating nuclear complex in Japan, there was a fire in Unit 4 for the second time in as many days.

Two workers have been missing since the first fire yesterday.

The fires were in the unit’s spent fuel pool, which contains vast amounts of high level radioactive waste. Like the reactor fuel, it must be kept under cool water, or else it will heat up and melt down. The fires have released large amount of radioactivity into the environment.

Units 1, 2 and 3 remain imperiled. Their reactors may be melting down. An explosion at Unit 2 “may have affected the integrity of its primary containment vessel,” according to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

An explosion at Unit 2 yesterday blasted a 26 foot hole in its containment building, and damaged an area below the reactor as well, the Associated Press reported.

This means it may well be releasing high levels of radioactivity into the environment as well.

Pressure inside units 5 and 6 was increasing because of hydrogen buildup, msnbc reported. This has led to explosions in the other units.

Japan’s Prime Minister, Naoto Kan, announced to the nation after the fire yesterday “The level seems very high, and there is still a very high risk of more radiation coming out.”

Just south of Fukushima, radiation levels were 100 times above normal, msnbc reported.

As the winds blew from Fukushima towards Tokyo, radiation levels there grew to 10 times above normal, Reuters reported.

And the Washington Post reported that US Nuclear Regulatory spokesperson David McIntyre stated “Right now it’s possible that there could be some radiation floating over the US.”

When Will They Ever Learn?

Meanwhile, US Secretary Steven Chu told a House panel that “Regulators should press ahead with approving construction for new [US] nuclear power plants despite Japan’s nuclear crisis,” msnbc reported.

“The American people should have full confidence that the United States has rigorous regulations in place to ensure that our nuclear power is generated safely and responsibly,” Chu asserted.

In the US 23 commercial reactors have the same General Electric design as the Fukushima ones. They are old and many have troubled safety records.

The Obama regime wants Congress to vote $36 billion for guaranteed loans to build new nuclear plants in the US.

This means that if the nuclear utilities default on these loans, the US taxpayer picks up the tab. It’s like a prepaid bailout.

The administration pushed $8 billion is such loans through Congress last year to build new nukes in Georgia.

Chu said the Obama administration would learn from Japan’s nuclear disaster.

But it appears it’s taking its lessons from its corporate masters once again.

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

avatar Robert Burns March 16, 2011 at 5:28 pm

Fuck B.O. I read this myself today or yesterday. I’m not wasting anymore time on him or his reliably corrupt DemonCrats nor their RapePublicans.


avatar Shane Finneran March 16, 2011 at 6:09 pm

Is the Obama Administration a disaster itself?


avatar Patty Jones March 16, 2011 at 6:51 pm

Maybe along the lines of Three Mile Island. A McCain/Palin presidency? A Chernobyl.


avatar Shane Finneran March 16, 2011 at 7:25 pm

She could see Chernobyl from her house. ;)


avatar Patty Jones March 16, 2011 at 7:36 pm

Think she suffered from the fallout?


avatar tj March 17, 2011 at 10:47 am


Can we have one or two in DC?

Or maybe, let’s just move the executive, legislative & judicial branches – from DC to San Onofre &/or Diablo Canyon …


avatar oBak March 19, 2011 at 12:11 am

So what kind of energy plant should be built? All plants have a chance to fail, and nuclear isn’t even the worst kind of failure.

The following is from http://io9.com/#!5783526/what-is-the-worst-kind-of-power-plant-disaster-hint-its-not-nuclear

1975: Shimantan/Banqiao Dam Failure
Type of power: Hydroelectric
Human lives lost: 171,000
Cost: $8,700,000,000
What happened: Shimantan Dam in China’s Henan province fails and releases 15.738 billion tons of water, causing widespread flooding that destroys 18 villages and 1500 homes and induces disease epidemics and famine

1979: Morvi Dam Failure
Type of power: Hydroelectric
Human lives lost: 1500 (estimated)
Cost: $1,024,000,000
What happened: Torrential rain and unprecidented flooding caused the Machchu-2 dam, situated on the Machhu river, to burst. This sent a wall of water through the town of Morvi in the Indian State of Gujarat.

1998: Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation Jess Oil Pipeline Explosion
Type of power: Oil
Human lives lost: 1,078
Cost: $54,000,000
What happened:Petroleum pipeline ruptures and explodes, destroying two villages and hundreds of villagers scavenging gasoline.

1944: East Ohio Gas Company
Type of power: Liquified natural gas (LNG)
Human lives lost: 130
Cost: $890,000,000
What happened: Explosion at LNG facility destroys one square mile of Cleveland, OH.

2007: Monongah Coal Mine
Type of power: Coal
Human lives lost: 362
Cost: $162,000,000
What happened: Underground explosion traps workers and destroys railroad bridges leading into the mine.


avatar Patty Jones March 19, 2011 at 1:30 am

Even without a failure, nuclear waste never, ever goes away. And nobody wants it in their backyard.


Leave a Comment

Before clicking Submit, please complete this simple statement to help us weed out the bots... Thank you! *

Older Article:

Newer Article: