Like a mutant monster in a B-Grade science fiction flick under attack, the besieged local daily fishwrap is flailing desperately as it stumbles towards its ultimate destiny. This death won’t be quick, and, using the vernacular of its militaristic editorial ancestors, there is likely to be a lot of collateral damage along the way.
The staff at the paper now seems to have realized that their new overlords could care less about the actual practice of publishing. The new owners –Platinum Equity– have continued shrinking the payroll and hired a “journalistic mortician” to oversee the newspaper’s operations. The top two stories of the UT office building in Mission Valley are to be vacated so they can be leased, and it’s no secret that Platinum would like to sell off the property, which it acquired for about 40% of its accessed $90 million value. In fact, the acquisition of the U-T was never about the newspaper; it was an opportunity for a group of smart investors to grab some prime real estate at firesale prices.
Columnist Michael Stetz recently revealed the level of despair at the U-T, penning a spirited defense of criticism that has been leveled at the paper in the wake of their decision to list the names and salaries of City employees as part of their “watchdog” program. Mr. Stetz:
I do have a dog in this fight, of course. I work for the newspaper. I love the newspaper. I believe in it. And I’m seeing something of a trend with it, one I think that public officials in the region should be aware of:
We still have ink. And while we’ve hardly been wary of spilling it before – we’ve done lots of tough pieces on local governments and elected leaders over the years – I believe we’re more prepared than ever to use it.
We read the papers too, you know. People claim we’re dying. We’re dead. We’re irrelevant.
My reaction: Try us. C’mon.
The “watchdog” articles in question here appear to be part of larger strategy, one that’s as old as yellow journalism: demonize a group or class of people, inferring that this group is a threat to the lives of ordinary citizens. In the case of the U-T, the “demons” are now trade unions. By nurturing this bogus threat, the paper hopes to overcome its past reputation as a “lapdog” for the local gentry.
Now that there are no longer communists supposedly massing just over the border, and it’s political & financial suicide to ignore or disparage Latinos, unions make for a very convenient target. In the most recent stories about City employees, the paper took public information (names & salaries) and presented it in a manner designed to paint those employees in the most negative manner possible. This is the “tar & feathers” of the Union-Tribune’s mob journalism.
As for the defensive musings of Mr. Stetz, he’s easily dismissed as either a fool or a tool.
It makes no difference to the U-T that union membership makes up an increasingly small percentage of the overall population. Facts don’t seem to be at issue here, like the paper’s failure to acknowledge that San Diego School Board has commissioned a study to see if parcel tax would be a feasible method of increasing revenues for local schools. The editorial denouncing this action skipped right past the “study” part of the deal and went on to, once again, claiming that a dastardly plot to destroy local education was underway at the hands of the big, bad, teachers union. (And, then, dipping back into its red baiting past, the editorialists revived their bleat about consultant & one-time activist Larry Remer, who is in charge of the effort. It’s the fourth time he’s been whined about by the paper in the last year.)
Disclosure time: It’s safe to say, like many people, that I have misgivings about what unions do and don’t do–see our coverage –but this demonizing crap is just beyond the pale. ALSO, Larry Remer & this author worked together back in the days of the San Diego Door.
What’s true about trade unions is that they do constitute the best organized and funded part of the Democratic Party. And, let’s face it, things aren’t so good for the U-T’s preferred Republican flavor of politicians these days. So the secondary objective of all this bashing over at the U-T is like a rear-guard action, buying time until the circular firing squad mode of the GOP winds down.
The point man for keeping that Republican flavor going on the editorial pages at our daily paper is one Chris Reed. He spent his formative years undergoing ideological training at The Orange County Register, joined the UT in 2005 and pens the paper’s online sop to wingnuts entitled “America’s Finest Blog”.
Even Mr. Reed has been on the defensive lately about his regular anti-union rants:
Because I’ve been writing so much about public employee union power, whether it’s in the Legislature or San Diego Unified, I’ve gotten quite a bit of blowback from people who accuse me of being pathologically anti-union or exaggerating union responsibility for governmental problems.
I’m not pathologically anti-union. I belonged to a union at my first daily newspaper. I wrote relatively little about unions during my stint as a metro columnist in the Inland Empire from 1995-1998. While op-ed columns editor, blogger and weekly columnist at the O.C. Register from 2002-2005, however, I began writing about unions more as the extent of their power in Sacramento became obvious. Now it’s pretty much topic no. 1 among all fiscal conservatives in this state.
I absolutely have sympathy for individual public employee union members who feel singled out and put upon by the newly intense criticism they’re hearing — if, that is, they oppose their union’s aggressive attempts to manipulate elected officials. But if union members support what their bosses are doing, sorry, no sympathy here.
Oh, and some of his best friends are probably union members, we bet.
Finally, we arrive at the papers’ latest flailing, aimed at the weekly San Diego Reader. If you had any doubt that things are bad down in Mission Valley, this latest salvo should be the icing on the cake. The powers that be at the U-T parent company are threatening to sue the San Diego Reader, a weekly publication popular for its calendar, cultural coverage, long-winded features and gossipy columnists.
The Readers’ large circulation is, perhaps, the strongest testimonial to the many failings of the U-T over the years. The papers’ advertising to content ratio simply puts the daily paper to shame. It’s not that the Reader is particularly progressive in any sense of the word. It’s just that the U-T has failed so abysmally over the years that local advertisers have had no choice but to look elsewhere for a “platform” that was more palatable for readers under 65 years of age.
Several ex-Union-Tribune employees have found homes at the paper. And, let’s face it, a large number of the recently discharged U-T employees are less than happy about their situations. So the Reader has run a lot of pieces shedding insight on the internal melt downs at the daily. It’s been like shooting fish in a barrel.
A front page trumpeted expose about Platinum Equity’s principals that appeared in the Reader last spring was much ado about nothing. It focused mostly on the immigrant backgrounds of the brothers Gore, reaching for any hint of scandal possible. When I read it, I (almost) felt sorry for Platinum’s owners, given that their place of birth seemed to be the most substantial allegation that the author unearthed.
Now, however, columnist Don Bauder has joined CNBC and the Los Angeles Times in bringing forth the whiff of scandal that eluded the Reader last spring. From this week’s paper:
Last month, the business/financial TV station CNBC quoted from two civil lawsuits, filed within the past three years, that charge Platinum Equity with sexual harassment, with giving special consideration to female employees who sleep with executives, and the like. There were settlement discussions with two of the plaintiffs, and both suits were dismissed. But Platinum won’t say if there were settlements with the female plaintiffs. (See adjoining column.) After getting the voluminous records from the lawsuits, the Reader asked Platinum’s public relations executive, Mark Barnhill, for a response.
The response the Reader got was penned by a Los Angeles lawyer, well known in the trade for his threatening tomes, usually aimed at gossip magazines publishing tidbits about celebrities:
But Beverly Hills’ Platinum Equity, the buyout firm that recently acquired the Union-Tribune, has hired Mad Dog Singer to fire off a letter to the Reader…. Among many things, the letter warned that if significant facts were omitted from a Reader story or if the story implied that the charges were true, Platinum would file a defamation suit “giving rise to potentially astronomical damages.” Warning of “immense monetary damages,” Singer’s letter admonished, “You proceed at your peril.” At the top of the letter were these words: “CONFIDENTIAL LEGAL NOTICE. NOT FOR PUBLICATION OR OTHER USE.” In a number of instances, the Reader has found, Singer’s threatening letters have been published despite his warning of a possible copyright violation. The letters we have seen contained the same language – words such as “malicious,” “defamatory,” and “violation of Copyright Act,” for example – that Singer uses in his letter to the Reader.
The letter sent to the Reader (click on the link attached to the word “response” in the paragraph above) is an all-time classic attempt at legal itimidation. In the event that the threat isn’t an empty one, the discovery phase will certainly yield a wealth of information about the inside workings of a big time equity group. But it’s much more likely that the U-T will be folded, probably sooner than later.